[The value of fructosamine in hemodialysis patients].

E Küenburg, M Brunnbauer, U Watzinger, F Winter, M M Müller, H Graf, R Prager
{"title":"[The value of fructosamine in hemodialysis patients].","authors":"E Küenburg,&nbsp;M Brunnbauer,&nbsp;U Watzinger,&nbsp;F Winter,&nbsp;M M Müller,&nbsp;H Graf,&nbsp;R Prager","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fructosamine is thought to be an alternative diabetic long term parameter to HbAlc. A possible advantage of fructosamine is the shorter half life of this parameter. Therefore changes in the metabolic control of diabetes can be evaluated faster. However, daily variations of protein concentrations limit the clinical usefulness of fructosamine, especially in patients on hemodialysis, where we see variations in total protein- and albumin concentration during dialysis. Due to these limitations we studied the clinical usefulness of a new fructosamine assay in 38 patients with chronic renal failure. Fructosamine values, total protein, albumin, blood glucose and creatinine were measured before and after three hours hemodialysis treatment as well as glycosylated hemoglobin. Before dialysis HbA1c correlated with HbA1c after dialysis (r = 0.99), which documents the usefulness of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients on hemodialysis. Fructosamine before dialysis shows a correlation with fructosamine values after dialysis of r = 0.77. After correction with total protein the correlation was r = 0.95, also after correction with albumin. Fructosamine values before and after dialysis correlated excellently (r = 0.95). Fructosamine values before and after dialysis can only be compared after correction with total protein or with albumin.</p>","PeriodicalId":76822,"journal":{"name":"Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. Supplementum","volume":"180 ","pages":"11-3; discussion 32-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fructosamine is thought to be an alternative diabetic long term parameter to HbAlc. A possible advantage of fructosamine is the shorter half life of this parameter. Therefore changes in the metabolic control of diabetes can be evaluated faster. However, daily variations of protein concentrations limit the clinical usefulness of fructosamine, especially in patients on hemodialysis, where we see variations in total protein- and albumin concentration during dialysis. Due to these limitations we studied the clinical usefulness of a new fructosamine assay in 38 patients with chronic renal failure. Fructosamine values, total protein, albumin, blood glucose and creatinine were measured before and after three hours hemodialysis treatment as well as glycosylated hemoglobin. Before dialysis HbA1c correlated with HbA1c after dialysis (r = 0.99), which documents the usefulness of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients on hemodialysis. Fructosamine before dialysis shows a correlation with fructosamine values after dialysis of r = 0.77. After correction with total protein the correlation was r = 0.95, also after correction with albumin. Fructosamine values before and after dialysis correlated excellently (r = 0.95). Fructosamine values before and after dialysis can only be compared after correction with total protein or with albumin.

果糖胺在血液透析患者中的应用价值
果糖胺被认为是替代HbAlc的糖尿病长期参数。果糖胺的一个可能的优点是该参数的半衰期较短。因此,可以更快地评估糖尿病代谢控制的变化。然而,蛋白质浓度的日常变化限制了果糖胺的临床用途,特别是在血液透析患者中,我们看到透析期间总蛋白和白蛋白浓度的变化。由于这些局限性,我们研究了一种新的果糖胺测定在38例慢性肾功能衰竭患者中的临床应用。测定血透治疗前后3 h的果糖胺、总蛋白、白蛋白、血糖、肌酐及糖化血红蛋白。透析前HbA1c与透析后HbA1c相关(r = 0.99),证明糖化血红蛋白在血液透析患者中的有用性。透析前果糖胺与透析后果糖胺值相关r = 0.77。用总蛋白校正后相关系数r = 0.95,用白蛋白校正后也是如此。透析前后果糖胺值相关性极好(r = 0.95)。透析前后果糖胺值只能与总蛋白或白蛋白校正后比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信