Human-inspired goal reasoning implementations: A survey

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ursula Addison
{"title":"Human-inspired goal reasoning implementations: A survey","authors":"Ursula Addison","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Goal reasoning is the ability of an artificial system to reason over its goals; it can identify, manage, plan, and execute its goals. In complex environments where requirements could change often, goal reasoning functionality is essential. Goal reasoning agents may rely on a motivation system to guide the goal reasoning process; we refer to such agents as motivated agents. Motivated agents can be explicitly or implicitly motivated by external or internal motivations. While the bulk of goal reasoning work has focused on agents that have implicit external motivations, internal motivations may offer some unique benefits to goal reasoning. As artificial internal motivations have a natural analogue to the human motivation system, this work investigates recent advances in motivated agents, where motivations are modeled on the human integrated-self. In this survey, we review those goal reasoning systems whose meta-reasoning and other goal reasoning subprocesses are at least in part intrinsic or identified, i.e., arising from idiosyncratic factors such as identity, a value system, emotions, experiences and so forth. For each system surveyed we evaluate its goal reasoning processes according to an analysis framework. We use our findings to draw conclusions about the potential benefits the three self-system categories: motives, mental simulation, and emotion bring to the goal reasoning paradigm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041723001158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal reasoning is the ability of an artificial system to reason over its goals; it can identify, manage, plan, and execute its goals. In complex environments where requirements could change often, goal reasoning functionality is essential. Goal reasoning agents may rely on a motivation system to guide the goal reasoning process; we refer to such agents as motivated agents. Motivated agents can be explicitly or implicitly motivated by external or internal motivations. While the bulk of goal reasoning work has focused on agents that have implicit external motivations, internal motivations may offer some unique benefits to goal reasoning. As artificial internal motivations have a natural analogue to the human motivation system, this work investigates recent advances in motivated agents, where motivations are modeled on the human integrated-self. In this survey, we review those goal reasoning systems whose meta-reasoning and other goal reasoning subprocesses are at least in part intrinsic or identified, i.e., arising from idiosyncratic factors such as identity, a value system, emotions, experiences and so forth. For each system surveyed we evaluate its goal reasoning processes according to an analysis framework. We use our findings to draw conclusions about the potential benefits the three self-system categories: motives, mental simulation, and emotion bring to the goal reasoning paradigm.

人类启发的目标推理实现:调查
目标推理是人工系统对其目标进行推理的能力;它可以识别、管理、计划和执行它的目标。在需求经常变化的复杂环境中,目标推理功能是必不可少的。目标推理主体可以依靠动机系统来指导目标推理过程;我们把这样的代理人称为动机代理人。受到激励的行为主体可以受到外部或内部动机的显性或隐性激励。虽然大部分的目标推理工作都集中在具有内隐外部动机的主体上,但内部动机可能为目标推理提供一些独特的好处。由于人工内部动机与人类动机系统有天然的相似之处,本研究调查了动机主体的最新进展,其中动机以人类的综合自我为模型。在本调查中,我们回顾了那些目标推理系统,其元推理和其他目标推理子过程至少部分是内在的或确定的,即由特殊因素如身份,价值系统,情感,经验等产生。对于所调查的每个系统,我们根据分析框架评估其目标推理过程。我们利用我们的发现来得出关于动机、心理模拟和情感这三种自我系统类别给目标推理范式带来的潜在好处的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信