Lauren Okamoto, Matthew Uechi, Patricia Blanchette, Sabine von Preyss-Friedman, Kamal Masaki
{"title":"Rapid Cycle Quality Improvement of Telemedicine Protocols in a Skilled Nursing Facility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Lauren Okamoto, Matthew Uechi, Patricia Blanchette, Sabine von Preyss-Friedman, Kamal Masaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was not well adopted in US nursing facilities. Many nursing facilities have since acknowledged its value due to the need for stricter infection control and reduction of exposure risk from face-to-face visits. A quality improvement project was conducted to improve telemedicine protocols in a high-volume post-acute care nursing facility, enhance provider and facility capability for visits, improve attitudes and skills toward telemedicine, and expand patient access to medical care during the pandemic. Process improvement was facilitated through identifying core areas of need and implementing interventions to address them. Project impact was measured by a retrospective pre-post survey of 7 questions to evaluate process improvement, attitudes, skills, and perceptions using a 5-point Likert scale (5=strongly agree, 1=strongly disagree) completed by 22 respondents (8 medical providers and 14 staff). Scores from before and after implementation were compared using paired t-tests. Respondents expressed improvement in perceived value (3.2 vs 4.8), personal skill/efficiency (2.3 vs 4.2), comfort level (2.3 vs 4.5), and scheduling process (2.3 vs 3.9) for telemedicine visits (all P≤.001). Respondents expressed increased awareness of barriers/benefits of telemedicine (2.8 vs 4.7, P<.001) and improved leadership commitment (2.6 vs 4.4, P<.001). The weekly average number of telemedicine visits per respondent increased significantly after protocol implementation (6.5 vs 25.6, P=.002). With support of facility leadership, interdisciplinary team members and engagement of key stakeholders, a telemedicine protocol was implemented in a single, high-volume, post-acute care skilled nursing facility during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing patients to receive needed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36659,"journal":{"name":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","volume":"82 11","pages":"256-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was not well adopted in US nursing facilities. Many nursing facilities have since acknowledged its value due to the need for stricter infection control and reduction of exposure risk from face-to-face visits. A quality improvement project was conducted to improve telemedicine protocols in a high-volume post-acute care nursing facility, enhance provider and facility capability for visits, improve attitudes and skills toward telemedicine, and expand patient access to medical care during the pandemic. Process improvement was facilitated through identifying core areas of need and implementing interventions to address them. Project impact was measured by a retrospective pre-post survey of 7 questions to evaluate process improvement, attitudes, skills, and perceptions using a 5-point Likert scale (5=strongly agree, 1=strongly disagree) completed by 22 respondents (8 medical providers and 14 staff). Scores from before and after implementation were compared using paired t-tests. Respondents expressed improvement in perceived value (3.2 vs 4.8), personal skill/efficiency (2.3 vs 4.2), comfort level (2.3 vs 4.5), and scheduling process (2.3 vs 3.9) for telemedicine visits (all P≤.001). Respondents expressed increased awareness of barriers/benefits of telemedicine (2.8 vs 4.7, P<.001) and improved leadership commitment (2.6 vs 4.4, P<.001). The weekly average number of telemedicine visits per respondent increased significantly after protocol implementation (6.5 vs 25.6, P=.002). With support of facility leadership, interdisciplinary team members and engagement of key stakeholders, a telemedicine protocol was implemented in a single, high-volume, post-acute care skilled nursing facility during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing patients to receive needed care.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前,美国的护理机构没有很好地采用远程医疗。此后,许多护理机构认识到它的价值,因为需要更严格的感染控制和减少面对面就诊的暴露风险。开展了一个质量改进项目,以改进大型急症后护理设施的远程医疗协议,增强提供者和设施的出诊能力,改善对远程医疗的态度和技能,并在大流行病期间扩大患者获得医疗服务的机会。通过确定核心需求领域和实施解决这些需求的干预措施,促进了进程的改进。项目影响是通过对22名受访者(8名医疗服务提供者和14名工作人员)使用5分李克特量表(5=非常同意,1=非常不同意)完成的7个问题的回顾性前后调查来衡量的,以评估流程改进、态度、技能和看法。采用配对t检验比较实施前后的得分。受访者表示远程医疗就诊的感知价值(3.2 vs 4.8)、个人技能/效率(2.3 vs 4.2)、舒适度(2.3 vs 4.5)和日程安排过程(2.3 vs 3.9)有所改善(所有P≤0.001)。受访者表示,他们对远程医疗的障碍/好处的认识有所提高(2.8 vs 4.7, P