{"title":"Concordance of verbal memory and language fMRI lateralization in people with epilepsy","authors":"Vasileios Kokkinos, Ioannis Seimenis","doi":"10.1111/jon.13171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This work investigates verbal memory functional MRI (fMRI) versus language fMRI in terms of lateralization, and assesses the validity of performing word recognition during the functional scan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy underwent verbal memory, visuospatial memory, and language fMRI. We used word encoding, word recognition, image encoding, and image recognition memory tasks, and semantic description, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension language tasks. We used three common lateralization metrics: network spatial distribution, maximum statistical value, and laterality index (LI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Lateralization of signal spatial distribution resulted in poor similarity between verbal memory and language fMRI tasks. Signal maximum lateralization showed significant (>.8) but not perfect (1) similarity. Word encoding LI showed significant correlation only with listening comprehension LI (<i>p</i> = .016). Word recognition LI was significantly correlated with expressive language semantic description LI (<i>p</i> = .024) and receptive language reading and listening comprehension LIs (<i>p</i> = .015 and <i>p</i> = .019, respectively). There was no correlation between LIs of the visuospatial tasks and LIs of the language tasks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results support the association between language and verbal memory lateralization, optimally determined by LI quantification, and the introduction of quantitative means for language fMRI interpretation in clinical settings where verbal memory lateralization is imperative.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"34 1","pages":"95-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.13171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
This work investigates verbal memory functional MRI (fMRI) versus language fMRI in terms of lateralization, and assesses the validity of performing word recognition during the functional scan.
Methods
Thirty patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy underwent verbal memory, visuospatial memory, and language fMRI. We used word encoding, word recognition, image encoding, and image recognition memory tasks, and semantic description, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension language tasks. We used three common lateralization metrics: network spatial distribution, maximum statistical value, and laterality index (LI).
Results
Lateralization of signal spatial distribution resulted in poor similarity between verbal memory and language fMRI tasks. Signal maximum lateralization showed significant (>.8) but not perfect (1) similarity. Word encoding LI showed significant correlation only with listening comprehension LI (p = .016). Word recognition LI was significantly correlated with expressive language semantic description LI (p = .024) and receptive language reading and listening comprehension LIs (p = .015 and p = .019, respectively). There was no correlation between LIs of the visuospatial tasks and LIs of the language tasks.
Conclusions
Our results support the association between language and verbal memory lateralization, optimally determined by LI quantification, and the introduction of quantitative means for language fMRI interpretation in clinical settings where verbal memory lateralization is imperative.
期刊介绍:
Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on:
MRI
CT
Carotid Ultrasound and TCD
SPECT
PET
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology
Functional MRI
Xenon CT
and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!