Concordance of verbal memory and language fMRI lateralization in people with epilepsy

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vasileios Kokkinos, Ioannis Seimenis
{"title":"Concordance of verbal memory and language fMRI lateralization in people with epilepsy","authors":"Vasileios Kokkinos,&nbsp;Ioannis Seimenis","doi":"10.1111/jon.13171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This work investigates verbal memory functional MRI (fMRI) versus language fMRI in terms of lateralization, and assesses the validity of performing word recognition during the functional scan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy underwent verbal memory, visuospatial memory, and language fMRI. We used word encoding, word recognition, image encoding, and image recognition memory tasks, and semantic description, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension language tasks. We used three common lateralization metrics: network spatial distribution, maximum statistical value, and laterality index (LI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Lateralization of signal spatial distribution resulted in poor similarity between verbal memory and language fMRI tasks. Signal maximum lateralization showed significant (&gt;.8) but not perfect (1) similarity. Word encoding LI showed significant correlation only with listening comprehension LI (<i>p</i> = .016). Word recognition LI was significantly correlated with expressive language semantic description LI (<i>p</i> = .024) and receptive language reading and listening comprehension LIs (<i>p</i> = .015 and <i>p</i> = .019, respectively). There was no correlation between LIs of the visuospatial tasks and LIs of the language tasks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results support the association between language and verbal memory lateralization, optimally determined by LI quantification, and the introduction of quantitative means for language fMRI interpretation in clinical settings where verbal memory lateralization is imperative.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"34 1","pages":"95-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.13171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

This work investigates verbal memory functional MRI (fMRI) versus language fMRI in terms of lateralization, and assesses the validity of performing word recognition during the functional scan.

Methods

Thirty patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy underwent verbal memory, visuospatial memory, and language fMRI. We used word encoding, word recognition, image encoding, and image recognition memory tasks, and semantic description, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension language tasks. We used three common lateralization metrics: network spatial distribution, maximum statistical value, and laterality index (LI).

Results

Lateralization of signal spatial distribution resulted in poor similarity between verbal memory and language fMRI tasks. Signal maximum lateralization showed significant (>.8) but not perfect (1) similarity. Word encoding LI showed significant correlation only with listening comprehension LI (p = .016). Word recognition LI was significantly correlated with expressive language semantic description LI (p = .024) and receptive language reading and listening comprehension LIs (p = .015 and p = .019, respectively). There was no correlation between LIs of the visuospatial tasks and LIs of the language tasks.

Conclusions

Our results support the association between language and verbal memory lateralization, optimally determined by LI quantification, and the introduction of quantitative means for language fMRI interpretation in clinical settings where verbal memory lateralization is imperative.

癫痫患者言语记忆和语言fMRI侧化的一致性。
背景和目的:本研究研究了言语记忆功能磁共振成像(fMRI)与语言功能磁共振成像(fMRI)在侧化方面的差异,并评估了在功能扫描期间进行单词识别的有效性。方法:对30例癫痫患者进行言语记忆、视觉空间记忆和语言功能磁共振检查。我们使用了单词编码、单词识别、图像编码和图像识别记忆任务,以及语义描述、阅读理解和听力理解语言任务。我们使用了三种常见的侧化指标:网络空间分布、最大统计值和侧化指数(LI)。结果:信号空间分布的偏侧化导致言语记忆和语言fMRI任务的相似性较差。信号最大偏侧显示显著(>.8)但不完全(1)相似。单词编码LI仅与听力理解LI呈显著相关(p = 0.016)。单词识别能力与表达性语言语义描述能力(p = 0.024)、接受性语言阅读和听力理解能力(p = 0.015和p = 0.019)显著相关。视觉空间任务和语言任务的li之间没有相关性。结论:我们的研究结果支持语言和言语记忆偏侧化之间的关联,这是通过LI量化来确定的,并且在言语记忆偏侧化至关重要的临床环境中,引入了定量手段来解释语言功能磁共振成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroimaging
Journal of Neuroimaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on: MRI CT Carotid Ultrasound and TCD SPECT PET Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology Functional MRI Xenon CT and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信