Comparison of in-gel and in-solution proteolysis in the proteome profiling of organ perfusion solutions.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Corinna M Snashall, Chris W Sutton, Letizia Lo Faro, Carlo Ceresa, Rutger Ploeg, Sadr Ul Shaheed
{"title":"Comparison of in-gel and in-solution proteolysis in the proteome profiling of organ perfusion solutions.","authors":"Corinna M Snashall, Chris W Sutton, Letizia Lo Faro, Carlo Ceresa, Rutger Ploeg, Sadr Ul Shaheed","doi":"10.1186/s12014-023-09440-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The organ perfusion solution (perfusate), collected at clinically and temporally significant stages of the organ preservation and transplantation process, provides a valuable insight into the biological status of an organ over time and prior to reperfusion (transplantation) in the recipient. The objective of this study was to assess two bottom-up proteomics workflows for the extraction of tryptic peptides from the perfusate.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>Two different kinds of perfusate samples from kidney and liver trials were profiled using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The preparation of clean peptide mixtures for downstream analysis was performed considering different aspects of sample preparation; protein estimation, enrichment, in-gel and urea-based in-solution digestion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-solution digestion of perfusate allowed identification of the highest number of peptides and proteins with greater sequence coverage and higher confidence data in kidney and liver perfusate. Key pathways identified by gene ontology analysis included complement, coagulation and antioxidant pathways, and a number of biomarkers previously linked to ischemia-reperfusion injury were also observed in perfusate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that in-solution digestion is a more efficient method for LC-MS/MS analysis of kidney and liver organ perfusion solutions. This method is also quicker and easier than in-gel digestion, allowing for greater sample throughput, with fewer opportunities for experimental error or peptide loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-023-09440-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The organ perfusion solution (perfusate), collected at clinically and temporally significant stages of the organ preservation and transplantation process, provides a valuable insight into the biological status of an organ over time and prior to reperfusion (transplantation) in the recipient. The objective of this study was to assess two bottom-up proteomics workflows for the extraction of tryptic peptides from the perfusate.

Experimental design: Two different kinds of perfusate samples from kidney and liver trials were profiled using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The preparation of clean peptide mixtures for downstream analysis was performed considering different aspects of sample preparation; protein estimation, enrichment, in-gel and urea-based in-solution digestion.

Results: In-solution digestion of perfusate allowed identification of the highest number of peptides and proteins with greater sequence coverage and higher confidence data in kidney and liver perfusate. Key pathways identified by gene ontology analysis included complement, coagulation and antioxidant pathways, and a number of biomarkers previously linked to ischemia-reperfusion injury were also observed in perfusate.

Conclusions: This study showed that in-solution digestion is a more efficient method for LC-MS/MS analysis of kidney and liver organ perfusion solutions. This method is also quicker and easier than in-gel digestion, allowing for greater sample throughput, with fewer opportunities for experimental error or peptide loss.

器官灌注液蛋白质组分析中凝胶内和溶液内蛋白水解的比较。
目的:在器官保存和移植过程的临床和时间重要阶段收集的器官灌注液(灌注液),为器官随时间和受体再灌注(移植)前的生物学状态提供了有价值的见解。本研究的目的是评估从灌注液中提取色氨酸肽的两种自下而上的蛋白质组学工作流程。实验设计:采用液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)对肾脏和肝脏两种不同类型的灌注液样品进行分析。考虑到样品制备的不同方面,进行了用于下游分析的清洁肽混合物的制备;蛋白质估计,富集,凝胶和基于尿素的溶液内消化。结果:在溶液中消化灌注液,可以在肾脏和肝脏灌注液中鉴定出最多数量的肽和蛋白质,具有更大的序列覆盖率和更高的置信度数据。通过基因本体论分析确定的关键途径包括补体、凝血和抗氧化途径,并且在灌注液中也观察到许多先前与缺血再灌注损伤相关的生物标志物。结论:本研究表明,液内消化法是一种更有效的LC-MS/MS分析肾、肝器官灌注液的方法。这种方法也比凝胶内消化更快,更容易,允许更大的样品通量,更少的实验误差或肽损失的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical proteomics
Clinical proteomics BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信