The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Metacognitive Strategy on Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension

Andin Ismayani, Linda Christine
{"title":"The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Metacognitive Strategy on Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension","authors":"Andin Ismayani, Linda Christine","doi":"10.33592/foremost.v3i2.2858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nThe goal of this study was to determine how Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Metacognitive Strategy affected students in the tenth grade at SMK Lab Business School in Tangerang. With the help of quasi-experimental research and qualitative data, this study was quantitative. Students in the tenth grade make up the research's total population, which is 276. The writer recruited 112 students for three classes—two experimental and one control—using purposive selection to choose the sample. The control class was taught using Conventional Instruction, as opposed to the experimental class which was taught using Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Metacognitive Strategy. The author utilized a written test to determine whether the data were normal and used the chi square formula and the fisher formula to determine whether the data were homogeneous. The findings of this study revealed that students' reading comprehension scores weren't very good after being taught the technique, as evidenced by the post-test mean values for students who were taught using the reciprocal method being lower than those who were taught using the metacognitive strategy.","PeriodicalId":185808,"journal":{"name":"Foremost Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foremost Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v3i2.2858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The goal of this study was to determine how Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Metacognitive Strategy affected students in the tenth grade at SMK Lab Business School in Tangerang. With the help of quasi-experimental research and qualitative data, this study was quantitative. Students in the tenth grade make up the research's total population, which is 276. The writer recruited 112 students for three classes—two experimental and one control—using purposive selection to choose the sample. The control class was taught using Conventional Instruction, as opposed to the experimental class which was taught using Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Metacognitive Strategy. The author utilized a written test to determine whether the data were normal and used the chi square formula and the fisher formula to determine whether the data were homogeneous. The findings of this study revealed that students' reading comprehension scores weren't very good after being taught the technique, as evidenced by the post-test mean values for students who were taught using the reciprocal method being lower than those who were taught using the metacognitive strategy.
互惠教学技巧与元认知策略对提高学生阅读理解能力的作用
摘要本研究旨在探讨互惠教学技巧和元认知策略对Tangerang市SMK Lab商学院十年级学生的影响。借助准实验研究和定性数据,本研究是定量的。十年级的学生构成了研究的总人数,即276人。作者招募了112名学生,分为三个班——两个实验组和一个对照组——采用有目的的选择来选择样本。对照班采用传统教学方法,实验组采用互惠教学方法和元认知策略进行教学。作者使用笔试来确定数据是否正态,并使用卡方公式和费雪公式来确定数据是否齐次。本研究发现,采用反比策略教学的学生的后测平均值低于采用元认知策略教学的学生,其阅读理解成绩并不是很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书