Paradoxical thinking as a paradigm of attitude change

Boaz Hameiri
{"title":"Paradoxical thinking as a paradigm of attitude change","authors":"Boaz Hameiri","doi":"10.4324/9781003042440-3-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter introduces a new approach to attitude change, termed paradoxical thinking. It suggests that messages that are consistent with an individual’s view, but formulated in an amplified, exaggerated, or even absurd manner, lead to an extended process of deliberative thinking and arouse lower levels of resistance compared to conventional persuasive approaches that use attitude-inconsistent messages. We argue that attitude-inconsistent messages are often automatically rejected among highly involved individuals with extreme views. The paradoxical thinking approach is intended to lead individuals to perceive their held societal beliefs or the current situation as farfetched and implausible, and ultimately, to lead to unfreezing and reevaluation of held attitudes. Eventually, unfreezing may lead to openness to alternative, more † Daniel Bar-Tal and Boaz Hameiri contributed equally to this work and are listed in alphabetical order. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology # 2020 Elsevier Inc. ISSN 0065-2601 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.003 1 ARTICLE IN PRESS","PeriodicalId":246256,"journal":{"name":"The Social Psychology of Humor","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Social Psychology of Humor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042440-3-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The chapter introduces a new approach to attitude change, termed paradoxical thinking. It suggests that messages that are consistent with an individual’s view, but formulated in an amplified, exaggerated, or even absurd manner, lead to an extended process of deliberative thinking and arouse lower levels of resistance compared to conventional persuasive approaches that use attitude-inconsistent messages. We argue that attitude-inconsistent messages are often automatically rejected among highly involved individuals with extreme views. The paradoxical thinking approach is intended to lead individuals to perceive their held societal beliefs or the current situation as farfetched and implausible, and ultimately, to lead to unfreezing and reevaluation of held attitudes. Eventually, unfreezing may lead to openness to alternative, more † Daniel Bar-Tal and Boaz Hameiri contributed equally to this work and are listed in alphabetical order. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology # 2020 Elsevier Inc. ISSN 0065-2601 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.003 1 ARTICLE IN PRESS
作为态度改变范例的矛盾思维
本章介绍了一种改变态度的新方法,称为悖论思维。它表明,与个人观点一致的信息,但以放大、夸张甚至荒谬的方式表述,会导致审慎思考的延伸过程,与使用态度不一致的信息的传统说服方法相比,会引起更低程度的抵制。我们认为,态度不一致的信息往往被高度参与的极端观点的个人自动拒绝。悖论思维方法旨在引导个人将其持有的社会信仰或现状视为牵强和不可信的,并最终导致对持有的态度的解冻和重新评估。最终,解冻可能会导致对其他选择的开放,Daniel Bar-Tal和Boaz Hameiri对这项工作做出了同样的贡献,并按字母顺序列出。实验社会心理学进展# 2020 Elsevier Inc.。版权所有。https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.003 1文章出版
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信