EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC), STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD), DAN JIGSAW SECARA ONLINE TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X DI SMK PGRI 1 NGAWI

Rohmatul Rohmatul, Erny Untari, Indra Puji Astuti
{"title":"EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC), STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD), DAN JIGSAW SECARA ONLINE TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X DI SMK PGRI 1 NGAWI","authors":"Rohmatul Rohmatul, Erny Untari, Indra Puji Astuti","doi":"10.30762/factor_m.v4i1.3407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract; Research objectives 1) To find out whether there are significant differences in student learning outcomes who are subject to CIRC, STAD, and Jigsaw in class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi; 2) to find out which one gives better student learning outcomes, students are subjected to CIRC, STAD, or Jigsaw. This study uses a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental research methods. The population is all students of class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi for the Academic Year 2020/2021. The sample is 100 students. The sampling technique used is Simple Random Sampling. Data collection techniques using documentation and tests. The instrument test used validity, difficulty level reliability, and discriminatory power. Prerequisite tests are normality test and homogeneity test. The analysis technique used one-way ANOVA and further test with Scheffe test. Research results 1) There are significant differences in student learning outcomes who are subject to CIRC, STAD, and online Jigsaw in class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi; 2) The learning outcomes of students who are subject to CIRC are better than the learning outcomes of students who are subject to STAD. The learning outcomes of students who were subjected to STAD were as good as the learning outcomes of students who were subjected to Jigsaw. The learning outcomes of students who were subjected to CIRC were as good as the learning outcomes of students who were subjected to Jigsaw. Keywords: CIRC, Learning Outcomes, Jigsaw, STAD ","PeriodicalId":306723,"journal":{"name":"Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v4i1.3407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract; Research objectives 1) To find out whether there are significant differences in student learning outcomes who are subject to CIRC, STAD, and Jigsaw in class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi; 2) to find out which one gives better student learning outcomes, students are subjected to CIRC, STAD, or Jigsaw. This study uses a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental research methods. The population is all students of class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi for the Academic Year 2020/2021. The sample is 100 students. The sampling technique used is Simple Random Sampling. Data collection techniques using documentation and tests. The instrument test used validity, difficulty level reliability, and discriminatory power. Prerequisite tests are normality test and homogeneity test. The analysis technique used one-way ANOVA and further test with Scheffe test. Research results 1) There are significant differences in student learning outcomes who are subject to CIRC, STAD, and online Jigsaw in class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi; 2) The learning outcomes of students who are subject to CIRC are better than the learning outcomes of students who are subject to STAD. The learning outcomes of students who were subjected to STAD were as good as the learning outcomes of students who were subjected to Jigsaw. The learning outcomes of students who were subjected to CIRC were as good as the learning outcomes of students who were subjected to Jigsaw. Keywords: CIRC, Learning Outcomes, Jigsaw, STAD 
合作学习模式整合合作型阅读与整合类型(CIRC)、学生成绩成绩科(STAD)和在线拼图针对SMK PGRI 1 NGAWI的X班学生学习结果
抽象的;研究目的1)了解SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi X班接受CIRC、STAD和Jigsaw的学生学习成果是否存在显著差异;2)为了找出哪一个能给学生带来更好的学习效果,学生们接受了CIRC、STAD或拼图测试。本研究采用准实验的定量研究方法。人口为2020/2021学年SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi的所有X班学生。样本是100名学生。使用的抽样技术是简单随机抽样。使用文档和测试的数据收集技术。工具检验采用效度、难易度、信度、辨别力。前提检验为正态性检验和同质性检验。分析方法采用单因素方差分析,进一步采用Scheffe检验。研究结果1)SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi X班接受CIRC、STAD和在线拼图的学生学习成果存在显著差异;2) CIRC组学生的学习效果优于STAD组学生的学习效果。STAD组学生的学习效果与拼图组学生的学习效果一样好。CIRC组学生的学习效果与拼图组学生的学习效果相同。关键词:中国保监会,学习成果,拼图,STAD
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信