The Dramatic Discourse

Marius Narcis Manoliu
{"title":"The Dramatic Discourse","authors":"Marius Narcis Manoliu","doi":"10.5040/9781472593603.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. VERBAL INTERACTIONMany studies on discourse analysis start from the basic presumtion concerning the communicative properties of language in general and the nature of speech interaction in particular. According to the Romanian Explanatory Dictionary, (2012) the interaction is defined as: reciprocal action (of objects or phenomena); mutual influence; influence, mutual conditioning between facts, events etc. [Cf.fr. interaction]. In the dramatic opera the interaction occurs between characters within the dialogue through which something is transmitted, conveyed. The communication always takes place in, a physical and cognitive environment enabling the relationship between the characters, namely the transmission and reception of the message.In this regard, D. Schiffrin, in his study Discourse Markers (1987) remarks that any interaction occurs in a context. The notion of context could be divided into three categories that overlap in any interaction:- the physical context refers to the environment in which the interaction takes place - at home, at work, in a public place. Spoken language generally occurs in face-to-face conversations, the speaker and the listener sharing the same physical context.- the personal context refers to the social and personal relations of people/characters who interact. The personal context also includes a group membership, the social and institutional roles of speakers and listeners, and the relative status and social distance that are relevant to participants.- the cognitive context refers to the environment they belong to and the knowledge shared by the participants in the interaction. The cognitive context, which is likely change as the interaction progresses, also extends on past experiences, cultural knowledge and the world perspective of the speaker.Claire Kramsch in Context and Culture in Language Teaching (1993) emphasizes the importance of context in teaching, the variety and divesity of interactive activities in meaningful contexts provide \"food for thought.... If communicative activities are not only to meet the needs of social maitanance, but potentially to bring about social and educational change, then we have to search for ways of explicitly varying the parameters of the interactional context. \"1*There are different ways in which can be explained how speech is organized, however all approaches must take into account the importance of context in the study of discourse. One approach is to focus on how the discourse is structured, the linear way of organizing it and how the components are linked together. A structural analysis seeks to explain how the elements of verbal exchanges, the replies are formed. For example, how the questions predict the answers, the statements predict the confirmations, the acknowledgments, how the requirements predict the reactions.Another way would be the study of discourse in terms of the strategy, the attention being focused on how speakers use different interactive tactics in certain moments of the discursive sequence.In the following example we have three types of discourse with the same structure:l.-Open the window. (The other person opens the window)2 - Will you open the window, please? (The other person opens the window)3.- It's so hot in here! (The other person opens the window)2 (P. Simpson, 1997)In all three verbal exchanges we deal with a requirement followed by a reaction, but the discourse strategy is different from a direct addressing, a requirement to be fulfilled (order), example 1, to a less direct requirement, mostly polite, example 2 and in an indirect way, example 3. The three forms of speech are marked both grammatically - imperative sentences as well as concerning spelling - using punctuation.The speakers use different discourse strategies while speaking, formal/informal language depending on the context, the issuer of a message, the speaker knows what to say, how to say, when to say in a certain context, this knowledge being what Dell Plymes calls communicative competence, that is, the adequate expression in a particular context. …","PeriodicalId":164961,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication Research","volume":"24 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593603.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

1. VERBAL INTERACTIONMany studies on discourse analysis start from the basic presumtion concerning the communicative properties of language in general and the nature of speech interaction in particular. According to the Romanian Explanatory Dictionary, (2012) the interaction is defined as: reciprocal action (of objects or phenomena); mutual influence; influence, mutual conditioning between facts, events etc. [Cf.fr. interaction]. In the dramatic opera the interaction occurs between characters within the dialogue through which something is transmitted, conveyed. The communication always takes place in, a physical and cognitive environment enabling the relationship between the characters, namely the transmission and reception of the message.In this regard, D. Schiffrin, in his study Discourse Markers (1987) remarks that any interaction occurs in a context. The notion of context could be divided into three categories that overlap in any interaction:- the physical context refers to the environment in which the interaction takes place - at home, at work, in a public place. Spoken language generally occurs in face-to-face conversations, the speaker and the listener sharing the same physical context.- the personal context refers to the social and personal relations of people/characters who interact. The personal context also includes a group membership, the social and institutional roles of speakers and listeners, and the relative status and social distance that are relevant to participants.- the cognitive context refers to the environment they belong to and the knowledge shared by the participants in the interaction. The cognitive context, which is likely change as the interaction progresses, also extends on past experiences, cultural knowledge and the world perspective of the speaker.Claire Kramsch in Context and Culture in Language Teaching (1993) emphasizes the importance of context in teaching, the variety and divesity of interactive activities in meaningful contexts provide "food for thought.... If communicative activities are not only to meet the needs of social maitanance, but potentially to bring about social and educational change, then we have to search for ways of explicitly varying the parameters of the interactional context. "1*There are different ways in which can be explained how speech is organized, however all approaches must take into account the importance of context in the study of discourse. One approach is to focus on how the discourse is structured, the linear way of organizing it and how the components are linked together. A structural analysis seeks to explain how the elements of verbal exchanges, the replies are formed. For example, how the questions predict the answers, the statements predict the confirmations, the acknowledgments, how the requirements predict the reactions.Another way would be the study of discourse in terms of the strategy, the attention being focused on how speakers use different interactive tactics in certain moments of the discursive sequence.In the following example we have three types of discourse with the same structure:l.-Open the window. (The other person opens the window)2 - Will you open the window, please? (The other person opens the window)3.- It's so hot in here! (The other person opens the window)2 (P. Simpson, 1997)In all three verbal exchanges we deal with a requirement followed by a reaction, but the discourse strategy is different from a direct addressing, a requirement to be fulfilled (order), example 1, to a less direct requirement, mostly polite, example 2 and in an indirect way, example 3. The three forms of speech are marked both grammatically - imperative sentences as well as concerning spelling - using punctuation.The speakers use different discourse strategies while speaking, formal/informal language depending on the context, the issuer of a message, the speaker knows what to say, how to say, when to say in a certain context, this knowledge being what Dell Plymes calls communicative competence, that is, the adequate expression in a particular context. …
戏剧话语
1. 言语互动语篇分析的许多研究都是从语言的交际特性,特别是言语互动的本质这一基本假设出发的。根据《罗马尼亚解释词典》(2012),相互作用被定义为:相互作用(对象或现象);相互影响;影响,影响,事实、事件等之间的相互制约交互)。在戏剧中,人物之间的互动发生在对话中,通过对话来传递和传达某些东西。交际总是发生在一个使人物之间的关系,即信息的传递和接收成为可能的物理和认知环境中。在这方面,D. Schiffrin在他的研究Discourse Markers(1987)中指出,任何互动都发生在语境中。语境的概念可以分为三类,在任何互动中都是重叠的:——物理语境指的是互动发生的环境——在家里,在工作中,在公共场所。口语通常发生在面对面的对话中,说话者和听者共享相同的物理环境。个人语境指的是互动的人/角色之间的社会和个人关系。个人语境还包括群体成员,说话者和听话者的社会和制度角色,以及与参与者相关的相对地位和社会距离。-认知语境是指他们所属的环境和互动中参与者共享的知识。随着互动的进行,认知语境可能会发生变化,它也会延伸到说话者过去的经历、文化知识和世界观。克莱尔·克拉姆什在《语言教学中的语境与文化》(1993)中强调了语境在教学中的重要性,在有意义的语境中,互动活动的多样性和多样性提供了“思想食粮”....如果交际活动不仅是为了满足社会维持的需要,而且有可能带来社会和教育的变化,那么我们就必须寻找明确改变互动环境参数的方法。1*有不同的方法可以解释言语是如何组织的,但是所有的方法都必须考虑语境在话语研究中的重要性。一种方法是关注话语的结构、线性组织方式以及组成部分如何联系在一起。结构分析试图解释语言交流的要素,即回答是如何形成的。例如,问题如何预测答案,陈述如何预测确认,致谢,需求如何预测反应。另一种方法是从策略的角度来研究话语,将注意力集中在说话者如何在话语序列的特定时刻使用不同的互动策略。在下面的例子中,我们有三种具有相同结构的语篇:-打开窗户。(另一个人打开窗户)请你打开窗户好吗?(另一个人打开窗户)-这里太热了!(另一个人打开窗户)2 (P. Simpson, 1997)在所有三种口头交流中,我们处理的是一个要求之后的反应,但话语策略不同于直接称呼,一个需要满足的要求(命令),例子1,不太直接的要求,主要是礼貌的,例子2,以间接的方式,例子3。这三种语言形式在语法上都有标记——祈使句和拼写——使用标点符号。说话者在说话时使用不同的话语策略,正式/非正式语言取决于语境,信息的发布者,说话者知道在特定语境中该说什么,怎么说,什么时候说,这种知识就是戴尔·普莱姆斯所说的交际能力,即在特定语境中适当的表达。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信