Tribes, boundaries, and intellectual silos: Science, technology, and engineering ethics education in the departmentalized world of academia

David K. McGraw, Amanda G. Biesecker
{"title":"Tribes, boundaries, and intellectual silos: Science, technology, and engineering ethics education in the departmentalized world of academia","authors":"David K. McGraw, Amanda G. Biesecker","doi":"10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In theory, science, technology, and engineering ethics lies at the intersection of these STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields and the disciplines of philosophy and/or religion. However, empirical studies suggest that there is relatively little interaction between those teaching courses such as bioethics or engineering ethics in biology or engineering departments and their counterparts in philosophy or religion departments. An analysis of the professors in academia suggests that most participate in one, and only one community of scholars. In order to address these concerns, the authors propose a number of possible solutions, including increased availability of philosophic and religious ethics instruction for STEM professors and of STEM education for religion and philosophy professors. In addition, structural changes in universities to encourage and promote interdisciplinary scholarship and team-teaching.","PeriodicalId":101738,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In theory, science, technology, and engineering ethics lies at the intersection of these STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields and the disciplines of philosophy and/or religion. However, empirical studies suggest that there is relatively little interaction between those teaching courses such as bioethics or engineering ethics in biology or engineering departments and their counterparts in philosophy or religion departments. An analysis of the professors in academia suggests that most participate in one, and only one community of scholars. In order to address these concerns, the authors propose a number of possible solutions, including increased availability of philosophic and religious ethics instruction for STEM professors and of STEM education for religion and philosophy professors. In addition, structural changes in universities to encourage and promote interdisciplinary scholarship and team-teaching.
部落、边界和知识孤岛:学术界部门化世界中的科学、技术和工程伦理教育
从理论上讲,科学、技术和工程伦理位于这些STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)领域与哲学和/或宗教学科的交叉点。然而,实证研究表明,生物系或工程系的生物伦理学或工程伦理学等课程的教学与哲学系或宗教系的教学之间的互动相对较少。一项对学术界教授的分析表明,大多数教授只参加一个学者团体。为了解决这些问题,作者提出了一些可能的解决方案,包括为STEM教授提供更多的哲学和宗教伦理指导,为宗教和哲学教授提供更多的STEM教育。此外,大学结构的变化,鼓励和促进跨学科的奖学金和团队教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信