SOCRATE: An Implementation Debacle

Christophe Eglizeau, Oliver Frey, M. Newman
{"title":"SOCRATE: An Implementation Debacle","authors":"Christophe Eglizeau, Oliver Frey, M. Newman","doi":"10.1049/IC:19960312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SOCRATE is a modified computerized reservation system based on SABRE, the original version built and used successfully by American Airlines. SNCF bought it for 1.3 billion Francs in 1989, with an expected yearly return on investment of 600 million Francs. The main purpose of introducing SOCRATE was to accommodate the expected huge increase in French railway traffic: 140 million reservations were expected in 1995 compared with 40 million one decade before. But as soon as it was introduced, SOCRATE generated chaos in railway stations and it soon became a national issue. The conclusion of an investigation was that the system was not properly working and bad to be modified as soon as possible. How can it happen that on the one hand SABRE provided American Airlines with a competitive strategic advantage, but on the other hand its customized version, SOCRATE, led to a decrease in traffic of 5.9% for the first semester of 1993 for SNCF? Why can SOCRATE be regarded as one of the best examples of what should be avoided in the process of implementing a new system? Which main factors caused the poor image of SOCRATE in SNCF? Did the image of SNCF in French society change due to the introduction of SOCRATE? In the paper, the authors attempt to give answers to these questions.","PeriodicalId":309896,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Information Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/IC:19960312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

SOCRATE is a modified computerized reservation system based on SABRE, the original version built and used successfully by American Airlines. SNCF bought it for 1.3 billion Francs in 1989, with an expected yearly return on investment of 600 million Francs. The main purpose of introducing SOCRATE was to accommodate the expected huge increase in French railway traffic: 140 million reservations were expected in 1995 compared with 40 million one decade before. But as soon as it was introduced, SOCRATE generated chaos in railway stations and it soon became a national issue. The conclusion of an investigation was that the system was not properly working and bad to be modified as soon as possible. How can it happen that on the one hand SABRE provided American Airlines with a competitive strategic advantage, but on the other hand its customized version, SOCRATE, led to a decrease in traffic of 5.9% for the first semester of 1993 for SNCF? Why can SOCRATE be regarded as one of the best examples of what should be avoided in the process of implementing a new system? Which main factors caused the poor image of SOCRATE in SNCF? Did the image of SNCF in French society change due to the introduction of SOCRATE? In the paper, the authors attempt to give answers to these questions.
执行失败
SOCRATE是在SABRE的基础上改进的计算机预订系统,SABRE是美国航空公司建立并成功使用的原始版本。法国国家铁路公司于1989年以13亿法郎的价格收购了它,预计每年的投资回报为6亿法郎。引进SOCRATE的主要目的是为了适应法国铁路交通预期的巨大增长:1995年预计有1.4亿份预订,而十年前为4 000万份。但是,SOCRATE一经推出,就在火车站引起了混乱,并很快成为全国性的问题。调查的结论是,该系统不能正常工作,必须尽快进行修改。为什么SABRE一方面为美国航空公司提供了竞争战略优势,但另一方面,它的定制版本SOCRATE却导致SNCF在1993年第一季度的客流量减少了5.9% ?为什么SOCRATE可以被视为在实施新系统的过程中应该避免的最好的例子之一?造成SOCRATE在SNCF中形象不佳的主要因素是什么?法国国家铁路公司在法国社会的形象是否因为SOCRATE的引入而改变?在本文中,作者试图给出这些问题的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书