How to regulate a Digital Twin City? Insights from a Proactive Law approach: How “human in the loop” and “precautionary principles” can serve policymakers in their attempt to incorporate respect of rights and solidarity in the smart city.

Gabriele Suffia
{"title":"How to regulate a Digital Twin City? Insights from a Proactive Law approach: How “human in the loop” and “precautionary principles” can serve policymakers in their attempt to incorporate respect of rights and solidarity in the smart city.","authors":"Gabriele Suffia","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to investigate, with a proactive approach to law, some of the core principles at the base of the Digital Twin Cities regulation. To do so, it briefly presents the debate on the inner vision in smart cities projects (and, consequently, also in DTC projects), moving from the ongoing debate between the “City as a Computer” as opposed to the “City as a Living Organism”, to arrive to a more practical approach – for the purposes of this work – formed by the dichotomy “Real-Time DTC” as opposed to “Simulation DTC”. Analyzing those scenarios, the principles of “human in the loop” and “precautionary principle” will be proposed to respond to the “Real-Time DTC” criticality, while also the “Simulation DTC” will be highlighted as a challenge for the lawmaker in its implementation.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to investigate, with a proactive approach to law, some of the core principles at the base of the Digital Twin Cities regulation. To do so, it briefly presents the debate on the inner vision in smart cities projects (and, consequently, also in DTC projects), moving from the ongoing debate between the “City as a Computer” as opposed to the “City as a Living Organism”, to arrive to a more practical approach – for the purposes of this work – formed by the dichotomy “Real-Time DTC” as opposed to “Simulation DTC”. Analyzing those scenarios, the principles of “human in the loop” and “precautionary principle” will be proposed to respond to the “Real-Time DTC” criticality, while also the “Simulation DTC” will be highlighted as a challenge for the lawmaker in its implementation.
如何规范数字双城?前瞻性法律方法的见解:“人在循环”和“预防原则”如何为政策制定者在智慧城市中融入尊重权利和团结的努力提供服务。
本文旨在以积极主动的法律方法调查数字双城法规基础的一些核心原则。为此,本文简要介绍了智慧城市项目(因此,也包括DTC项目)中关于内在愿景的辩论,从“城市作为计算机”与“城市作为一个活的有机体”之间的持续辩论转向更实用的方法——出于本工作的目的——由“实时DTC”与“模拟DTC”的二分法形成。分析这些场景,将提出“人在循环”和“预防原则”的原则,以应对“实时DTC”的危机性,并强调“模拟DTC”将成为立法者在实施过程中的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信