Fighting for Those Who Fight for Us: Protecting the Rights of Servicemembers and Veterans

Aaj Research
{"title":"Fighting for Those Who Fight for Us: Protecting the Rights of Servicemembers and Veterans","authors":"Aaj Research","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3179575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are just over two million men and women in the uniformed services of the United States. By voluntarily joining, all have signaled that they are prepared to risk their lives to defend their country. They do not appear at first blush to be a vulnerable community. Yet their unique situation — predominantly young and financially inexperienced, often relocated or deployed abroad, and sometimes facing inconsistent access to phones and internet — has made them a target for the unscrupulous. Even as they drape themselves in the American flag, corporations have foreclosed on servicemembers’ family homes, repossessed their cars, scammed their pensions, fired employees called to active duty, and even profited from their life insurance policies when they have been killed. Congress has passed laws to protect the rights of servicemembers and veterans — including the Military Lending Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act — but corporations frequently use legal maneuvers like forced arbitration to avoid accountability when they violate these laws. The injustice to servicemembers and veterans doesn’t stop there. Servicemembers are also being denied the constitutional rights they fight to protect because of a 1950 Supreme Court ruling, known as the Feres doctrine, which mandates that no servicemember can hold the government accountable for negligence or wrongdoing. And veterans who experienced physical or psychological injuries during their service are now battling opioid addictions or are facing severe, sometimes fatal ailments after being exposed to toxic substances. When the government fails to protect the rights of the men and women who make up America’s first line of defense, the civil justice system has proven to be the last line of defense.","PeriodicalId":430335,"journal":{"name":"Veterans & Military Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterans & Military Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3179575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are just over two million men and women in the uniformed services of the United States. By voluntarily joining, all have signaled that they are prepared to risk their lives to defend their country. They do not appear at first blush to be a vulnerable community. Yet their unique situation — predominantly young and financially inexperienced, often relocated or deployed abroad, and sometimes facing inconsistent access to phones and internet — has made them a target for the unscrupulous. Even as they drape themselves in the American flag, corporations have foreclosed on servicemembers’ family homes, repossessed their cars, scammed their pensions, fired employees called to active duty, and even profited from their life insurance policies when they have been killed. Congress has passed laws to protect the rights of servicemembers and veterans — including the Military Lending Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act — but corporations frequently use legal maneuvers like forced arbitration to avoid accountability when they violate these laws. The injustice to servicemembers and veterans doesn’t stop there. Servicemembers are also being denied the constitutional rights they fight to protect because of a 1950 Supreme Court ruling, known as the Feres doctrine, which mandates that no servicemember can hold the government accountable for negligence or wrongdoing. And veterans who experienced physical or psychological injuries during their service are now battling opioid addictions or are facing severe, sometimes fatal ailments after being exposed to toxic substances. When the government fails to protect the rights of the men and women who make up America’s first line of defense, the civil justice system has proven to be the last line of defense.
为那些为我们而战的人而战:保护军人和退伍军人的权利
美国有200多万名男女军人。通过自愿加入,所有人都表明他们准备冒着生命危险保卫自己的国家。乍一看,他们似乎不是一个脆弱的群体。然而,他们的独特处境——主要是年轻人,缺乏财务经验,经常被调离或部署到国外,有时还面临电话和互联网不稳定的问题——使他们成为不择手段的人的目标。即使他们把自己裹在美国国旗上,公司也取消了军人的房屋赎回权,收回了他们的汽车,骗取了他们的养老金,解雇了被征召入伍的员工,甚至在他们被杀后从他们的人寿保险单中获利。国会已经通过了保护军人和退伍军人权利的法律——包括《军事借贷法》、《军人民事救济法》和《军服就业和再就业权利法》——但企业在违反这些法律时经常使用强制仲裁等法律手段来逃避责任。对军人和退伍军人的不公正还不止于此。军人还被剥夺了他们争取保护的宪法权利,因为1950年最高法院的一项裁决,即所谓的“费里斯原则”(Feres doctrine),该裁决规定,任何军人都不能对政府的疏忽或不当行为负责。在服役期间遭受身体或心理伤害的退伍军人现在正在与阿片类药物成瘾作斗争,或者在接触有毒物质后面临严重的,有时是致命的疾病。当政府不能保护构成美国第一道防线的男男女女的权利时,民事司法制度已被证明是最后一道防线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信