Radiological Correlation of Negative Appendectomies: A Clinical Audit

Aliya Ishaq, Sameera Naureen, Yasir M. Amin, Muhammad jamshaid Khan, A. Latif, S. Anwar, E. Ghazi
{"title":"Radiological Correlation of Negative Appendectomies: A Clinical Audit","authors":"Aliya Ishaq, Sameera Naureen, Yasir M. Amin, Muhammad jamshaid Khan, A. Latif, S. Anwar, E. Ghazi","doi":"10.31487/j.rdi.2021.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Appendectomy is the most common surgical emergency and negative appendectomy is a one of recognized consequence of appendectomy. Recently an increased use of radiology is seen in diagnosing appendicitis and it has significantly decreased the rate of negative appendectomy. Every effort should be made to establish an exact diagnosis. If, however, this is impossible and a suspicion of appendicitis exists, exploration is mandatory. It is far better to subject a moderate number of patients to a theoretically unnecessary operation than to let one patient suffer perforation.\nAim: Recently we have seen an increased use of radiology in our department for diagnosing appendicitis. The idea of conducting this audit was to calculate our negative appendectomy rate by correlating it with use of radiology and to compare it with international figures and to set up guidelines for use of radiology in diagnosing appendicitis on basis of results of our audit.\nMethods: Records of all patients who underwent appendectomy in Dubai Hospital, UAE from Jan 2018 to Jan 2019 were retrospectively analysed using electronic record system. Clinical diagnosis and radiological findings were compared with histopathology as gold standard for negative appendectomy rate. The sensitivity and specificity of different radiological procedures was calculated as well.\nResults: Total 165 patients underwent appendectomy in specified duration. Overall negative appendectomy rate was 17% with male being 9.7% and female rate 31%. CT scan was found to be 100% specific and 91.4% sensitive in diagnosing appendicitis while clinical diagnosis was accurate in 88.5% cases.","PeriodicalId":308916,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rdi.2021.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Appendectomy is the most common surgical emergency and negative appendectomy is a one of recognized consequence of appendectomy. Recently an increased use of radiology is seen in diagnosing appendicitis and it has significantly decreased the rate of negative appendectomy. Every effort should be made to establish an exact diagnosis. If, however, this is impossible and a suspicion of appendicitis exists, exploration is mandatory. It is far better to subject a moderate number of patients to a theoretically unnecessary operation than to let one patient suffer perforation. Aim: Recently we have seen an increased use of radiology in our department for diagnosing appendicitis. The idea of conducting this audit was to calculate our negative appendectomy rate by correlating it with use of radiology and to compare it with international figures and to set up guidelines for use of radiology in diagnosing appendicitis on basis of results of our audit. Methods: Records of all patients who underwent appendectomy in Dubai Hospital, UAE from Jan 2018 to Jan 2019 were retrospectively analysed using electronic record system. Clinical diagnosis and radiological findings were compared with histopathology as gold standard for negative appendectomy rate. The sensitivity and specificity of different radiological procedures was calculated as well. Results: Total 165 patients underwent appendectomy in specified duration. Overall negative appendectomy rate was 17% with male being 9.7% and female rate 31%. CT scan was found to be 100% specific and 91.4% sensitive in diagnosing appendicitis while clinical diagnosis was accurate in 88.5% cases.
阴性阑尾切除术的影像学相关性:临床审计
前言:阑尾切除术是最常见的外科急症,阴性阑尾切除术是阑尾切除术公认的后果之一。近年来,在阑尾炎的诊断中越来越多地使用放射学,这大大降低了阑尾切除术阴性的发生率。应尽一切努力作出准确的诊断。然而,如果这是不可能的,并且怀疑存在阑尾炎,则必须进行检查。让适量的病人接受理论上不必要的手术要比让一个病人遭受穿孔好得多。目的:最近我们发现在我们的科室越来越多地使用放射学来诊断阑尾炎。进行这次审计的想法是通过将我们的阑尾切除阴性率与放射学的使用相关联,并将其与国际数字进行比较,并根据审计结果制定使用放射学诊断阑尾炎的指导方针。方法:采用电子病历系统对2018年1月至2019年1月在阿联酋迪拜医院行阑尾切除术的所有患者进行回顾性分析。将临床诊断和影像学表现与组织病理学相比较,作为阑尾切除阴性率的金标准。计算了不同放射治疗方法的敏感性和特异性。结果:165例患者在规定时间内行阑尾切除术。阑尾切除术总体阴性率为17%,男性为9.7%,女性为31%。CT扫描诊断阑尾炎的特异性为100%,敏感性为91.4%,临床诊断准确率为88.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信