Proctored in Person or via Webcam: Is There a Difference?

Oskar Harmon, J. Lambrinos, Paul Tomolonis
{"title":"Proctored in Person or via Webcam: Is There a Difference?","authors":"Oskar Harmon, J. Lambrinos, Paul Tomolonis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3057006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses data from a Principles of Microeconomics course taught in online format. For the cumulative multiple-choice final exam, students were asked to select one of two proctoring formats: a traditional proctor in an in-person classroom, or proctored at home via a webcam proctoring service. Learning outcomes are predicted from a model with independent variables of student characteristics common to the literature. The authors expect the prediction model to have the same explanatory power for both proctored exam formats. If there is a significant difference in explanatory power of the two models, this can be attributed to unobserved factors such as cheating or anxiety related to the proctoring format. This study is a follow-up to an earlier study on the comparison of the proctoring formats of the traditional an in-person classroom proctor and an unproctored online exam.","PeriodicalId":153695,"journal":{"name":"Cognition in Mathematics","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3057006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses data from a Principles of Microeconomics course taught in online format. For the cumulative multiple-choice final exam, students were asked to select one of two proctoring formats: a traditional proctor in an in-person classroom, or proctored at home via a webcam proctoring service. Learning outcomes are predicted from a model with independent variables of student characteristics common to the literature. The authors expect the prediction model to have the same explanatory power for both proctored exam formats. If there is a significant difference in explanatory power of the two models, this can be attributed to unobserved factors such as cheating or anxiety related to the proctoring format. This study is a follow-up to an earlier study on the comparison of the proctoring formats of the traditional an in-person classroom proctor and an unproctored online exam.
亲自监考还是通过网络摄像头监考:有区别吗?
这项研究使用的数据来自在线授课的《微观经济学原理》课程。对于期末考试的多项选择题,学生们被要求在两种监考形式中选择一种:一种是传统的监考老师在教室里亲自监考,另一种是通过网络摄像头监考服务在家里监考。学习结果是通过一个模型来预测的,该模型具有文献中常见的学生特征的自变量。作者期望预测模型对两种监考考试格式具有相同的解释力。如果两个模型的解释能力有显著差异,这可以归因于未观察到的因素,如与监考形式相关的作弊或焦虑。本研究是对传统的面对面课堂监考和无监考在线考试监考形式比较研究的后续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信