The Quest for Post-Chineseness Among Chinese Indonesian Intellectuals: An Intellectual History Agenda

Harryanto Aryodiguno, C. Shih
{"title":"The Quest for Post-Chineseness Among Chinese Indonesian Intellectuals: An Intellectual History Agenda","authors":"Harryanto Aryodiguno, C. Shih","doi":"10.1142/s1013251123500066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the challenge of defining Chineseness, various disciplines can contribute to the subject without a single authority having a monopoly over its scope. Post-Chineseness is an evolving movement that aims to reduce the embarrassment of China scholars at their failure to exchange the methodologies and scopes of their subjects, often rendering them strangers to one another. Recognition is particularly relevant to the study of post-Chineseness. Chineseness is mutually recognized and denied in a variety of ways among both Chinese communities and individuals and in both self-regarded and other-regarded identities. Divergent approaches have created complex behavioral implications and a massive agenda for social science research. An agenda for post-Chineseness can examine these crises in the contemporary social sciences and humanities and has the potential to offer sophistication, recombination, and reconstruction for Chineseness in different contexts. This case study of several Chinese Indonesian intellectuals who have described their identity and connection with China illustrates how an agenda of post-Chineseness can simultaneously explain and deconstruct.","PeriodicalId":274099,"journal":{"name":"Issues & Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues & Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013251123500066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the challenge of defining Chineseness, various disciplines can contribute to the subject without a single authority having a monopoly over its scope. Post-Chineseness is an evolving movement that aims to reduce the embarrassment of China scholars at their failure to exchange the methodologies and scopes of their subjects, often rendering them strangers to one another. Recognition is particularly relevant to the study of post-Chineseness. Chineseness is mutually recognized and denied in a variety of ways among both Chinese communities and individuals and in both self-regarded and other-regarded identities. Divergent approaches have created complex behavioral implications and a massive agenda for social science research. An agenda for post-Chineseness can examine these crises in the contemporary social sciences and humanities and has the potential to offer sophistication, recombination, and reconstruction for Chineseness in different contexts. This case study of several Chinese Indonesian intellectuals who have described their identity and connection with China illustrates how an agenda of post-Chineseness can simultaneously explain and deconstruct.
印尼华人知识分子对后中国性的追求:思想史议程
由于定义中国性的挑战,不同的学科可以在没有单一权威垄断其范围的情况下为这一主题做出贡献。后中国性是一场不断发展的运动,旨在减少中国学者因无法交流各自研究课题的方法和范围而产生的尴尬,这种尴尬往往使他们彼此变得陌生。认知与后中国性的研究尤其相关。在华人社区和华人个人之间,在自我认同和他人认同中,中国人性以各种方式相互承认和否定。不同的方法产生了复杂的行为含义和社会科学研究的大量议程。后中国性议程可以审视当代社会科学和人文科学中的这些危机,并有可能为不同背景下的中国性提供复杂、重组和重建的机会。本文对几位华裔印尼知识分子的案例研究,他们描述了自己与中国的身份和联系,说明了后中国性的议程如何同时解释和解构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书