How Promoting a Merit-Based Immigration System Can Help Alleviate the DACA Problem

José V. Gallegos
{"title":"How Promoting a Merit-Based Immigration System Can Help Alleviate the DACA Problem","authors":"José V. Gallegos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3519864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court began hearing arguments on November 12, 2019 as to whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable, and whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. The likely wind down of DACA will affect more than 700,000 individuals who came to the U.S. as children without proper documentation, commonly referred to as “Dreamers,” after the DREAM Act was proposed in 2017, but failed to pass. \n \nThey are generally college-educated, high-skilled workers, members of the military, and heads of families that include U.S. citizen children. Despite overwhelming support (Recent polls indicate that 86% of the American public would like to see those who qualify for DACA granted residency), Congress has failed to provide these individuals with an opportunity to obtain permanent residency. \n \nThis paper stresses the problems with the current immigration system, emphasizing the need to change the current employment-based visa system that has not been updated to keep up with technological advances in the growing international economy. \n \nAlthough many companies in the country publicly “stand with” those affected by the likely repeal of DACA, lobbying for a change in the employment-based system to allow for qualified individuals to obtain residency through work visas is a better approach than pushing for amnesty, which has failed in the past. \n \nAllowing DACA recipients to qualify for employment-based visas alleviates unemployment in the United States while also rewarding those individuals who obtained the skills and education to stay competitive in the current career market.","PeriodicalId":284417,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Race","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3519864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Supreme Court began hearing arguments on November 12, 2019 as to whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable, and whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. The likely wind down of DACA will affect more than 700,000 individuals who came to the U.S. as children without proper documentation, commonly referred to as “Dreamers,” after the DREAM Act was proposed in 2017, but failed to pass. They are generally college-educated, high-skilled workers, members of the military, and heads of families that include U.S. citizen children. Despite overwhelming support (Recent polls indicate that 86% of the American public would like to see those who qualify for DACA granted residency), Congress has failed to provide these individuals with an opportunity to obtain permanent residency. This paper stresses the problems with the current immigration system, emphasizing the need to change the current employment-based visa system that has not been updated to keep up with technological advances in the growing international economy. Although many companies in the country publicly “stand with” those affected by the likely repeal of DACA, lobbying for a change in the employment-based system to allow for qualified individuals to obtain residency through work visas is a better approach than pushing for amnesty, which has failed in the past. Allowing DACA recipients to qualify for employment-based visas alleviates unemployment in the United States while also rewarding those individuals who obtained the skills and education to stay competitive in the current career market.
推广择优移民制度如何有助于缓解DACA问题
2019年11月12日,最高法院开始就国土安全部终止“童年抵美者暂缓遣返”政策的决定是否具有司法可复审性,以及国土安全部终止“DACA”政策的决定是否合法等问题举行听证会。DACA计划可能被取消,将影响到70多万小时候没有适当证件来到美国的人,这些人通常被称为“梦想家”,他们在2017年提出了《梦想法案》,但未能通过。他们通常是受过大学教育的高技能工人、军人和有美国公民子女的家长。尽管得到了压倒性的支持(最近的民意调查显示,86%的美国公众希望看到那些符合DACA资格的人获得居留权),但国会未能为这些人提供获得永久居留权的机会。本文强调了当前移民制度的问题,强调需要改变目前以就业为基础的签证制度,该制度没有更新,以跟上不断增长的国际经济中的技术进步。尽管美国许多公司公开“支持”那些可能被废除DACA计划而受到影响的人,但游说改变以就业为基础的体系,允许符合条件的个人通过工作签证获得居留权,是比推动大赦更好的方法,后者在过去失败过。允许DACA受助人有资格获得以就业为基础的签证,减轻了美国的失业问题,同时也奖励了那些获得技能和教育的人,使他们在当前的职业市场上保持竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信