Neolithic transverse arrowheads – a great misunderstanding

Andreas Valentin Wadskjær
{"title":"Neolithic transverse arrowheads – a great misunderstanding","authors":"Andreas Valentin Wadskjær","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2018.1523526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One of the most debated subjects in archaeology is the transition between the Mesolithic and the Neolithic period. A missing piece in this debate has been the transverse arrowhead, which is a relic from the hunting and gathering society but still has its place in the new agrarian societies. What we think we know about transverse arrowheads from Southern Scandinavia is based on a more than 75 years old theory, which hypothesises that Neolithic arrowheads were manufactured from irregular or polished flakes. This article offers a critical review of research so far into transverse arrowheads in Southern Scandinavia. It does so by proposing a new typo-chronology of Neolithic arrowheads from this region, which demonstrates how the transverse arrowhead developed from the Late Mesolithic to the Middle Neolithic, and it is actually the first study with the main focus on this subject. The study is concluded with a discussion that argues the empirical basis for the typological restructuring and highlights the implications of the study for the broader debate on Neolithisation.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2018.1523526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT One of the most debated subjects in archaeology is the transition between the Mesolithic and the Neolithic period. A missing piece in this debate has been the transverse arrowhead, which is a relic from the hunting and gathering society but still has its place in the new agrarian societies. What we think we know about transverse arrowheads from Southern Scandinavia is based on a more than 75 years old theory, which hypothesises that Neolithic arrowheads were manufactured from irregular or polished flakes. This article offers a critical review of research so far into transverse arrowheads in Southern Scandinavia. It does so by proposing a new typo-chronology of Neolithic arrowheads from this region, which demonstrates how the transverse arrowhead developed from the Late Mesolithic to the Middle Neolithic, and it is actually the first study with the main focus on this subject. The study is concluded with a discussion that argues the empirical basis for the typological restructuring and highlights the implications of the study for the broader debate on Neolithisation.
新石器时代的横箭头——一个很大的误解
中石器时代与新石器时代的过渡是考古学中争论最多的话题之一。这场争论中缺失的部分是横向箭头,它是狩猎和采集社会的遗物,但在新的农业社会中仍然占有一席之地。我们对来自南斯堪的纳维亚的横向箭头的了解是基于一个超过75年历史的理论,该理论假设新石器时代的箭头是由不规则或抛光的薄片制成的。这篇文章提供了一个批判性的审查研究到目前为止,横向箭头在南斯堪的纳维亚半岛。它提出了一种来自该地区的新石器时代箭头的新类型年表,证明了横向箭头是如何从中石器时代晚期发展到新石器时代中期的,这实际上是第一个主要关注这一主题的研究。本研究最后讨论了类型学重构的经验基础,并强调了该研究对新石器时代更广泛辩论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信