Was It Russian Public Television That Won It?

S. White, I. McAllister, S. Oates
{"title":"Was It Russian Public Television That Won It?","authors":"S. White, I. McAllister, S. Oates","doi":"10.1177/1081180X0200700203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A nationally representative survey conducted immediately after the December 1999 Russian Duma election indicates that national television was the most important source of news for voters and that there were few differences between the party supporters in their patterns of viewing. Voters for the pro-Kremlin Unity party, however, were the most likely to say they had been influenced by state television, and regression analysis indicates that state television was by far the most important of all the variables that contributed to their voting choices. The Russian Duma election accordingly provides a striking illustration of the extent to which a determined regime can resist a challenge to its authority by using its control of the media, particularly state television.","PeriodicalId":145232,"journal":{"name":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X0200700203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

A nationally representative survey conducted immediately after the December 1999 Russian Duma election indicates that national television was the most important source of news for voters and that there were few differences between the party supporters in their patterns of viewing. Voters for the pro-Kremlin Unity party, however, were the most likely to say they had been influenced by state television, and regression analysis indicates that state television was by far the most important of all the variables that contributed to their voting choices. The Russian Duma election accordingly provides a striking illustration of the extent to which a determined regime can resist a challenge to its authority by using its control of the media, particularly state television.
是俄罗斯公共电视台赢了吗?
1999年12月俄罗斯杜马选举后立即进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查表明,国家电视台是选民最重要的新闻来源,各政党支持者在观看节目的方式上几乎没有差别。然而,支持克里姆林宫的统一党的选民最有可能说他们受到了国家电视台的影响,回归分析表明,国家电视台是迄今为止影响他们投票选择的所有变量中最重要的一个。因此,俄罗斯杜马选举提供了一个引人注目的例子,说明一个意志坚定的政权可以在多大程度上通过控制媒体(尤其是国家电视台)来抵制对其权威的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信