Can Imperialists Produce Knowledge?

S. Leonard
{"title":"Can Imperialists Produce Knowledge?","authors":"S. Leonard","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mountstuart Elphinstone's administration as Governor of Bombay consolidated East India Company rule over large tracts of Central, Western, and Northwestern India. It represented a new and unmistakable projection of both British armed force and knowledge production. In this chapter, the work of a prominent soldier-administrator scholar whose work was strongly encouraged by Elphinstone, the father of Maratha history, James Grant Duff, is taken up. The line of argument is that, despite the imperial and military conditions that made Grant Duff's research possible, it is a mistake to see it simply as a project of colonial hegemony and not a major, even foundational intellectual production and act of public reason submitted to the cosmopolitan world of letters from which Indians were not, in principle, excluded. The chapter thus suggests grounds for breaking with the Saidian paradigm not simply on positivist grounds, but in favor of finer grained historical and more discerning ideological analysis. This means paying close attention to Grant Duff's (and his History's) struggle against the East India Company itself, whose chief interest was not knowledge so much as secrecy.","PeriodicalId":403338,"journal":{"name":"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mountstuart Elphinstone's administration as Governor of Bombay consolidated East India Company rule over large tracts of Central, Western, and Northwestern India. It represented a new and unmistakable projection of both British armed force and knowledge production. In this chapter, the work of a prominent soldier-administrator scholar whose work was strongly encouraged by Elphinstone, the father of Maratha history, James Grant Duff, is taken up. The line of argument is that, despite the imperial and military conditions that made Grant Duff's research possible, it is a mistake to see it simply as a project of colonial hegemony and not a major, even foundational intellectual production and act of public reason submitted to the cosmopolitan world of letters from which Indians were not, in principle, excluded. The chapter thus suggests grounds for breaking with the Saidian paradigm not simply on positivist grounds, but in favor of finer grained historical and more discerning ideological analysis. This means paying close attention to Grant Duff's (and his History's) struggle against the East India Company itself, whose chief interest was not knowledge so much as secrecy.
帝国主义者能生产知识吗?
蒙特斯图亚特·埃尔芬斯通(Mountstuart Elphinstone)作为孟买总督的政府巩固了东印度公司对印度中部、西部和西北部大片地区的统治。它代表了英国武装力量和知识生产的一种新的、明确无误的投射。在本章中,一位杰出的军人管理学者的工作,他的工作受到了埃尔芬斯通,马拉地历史之父詹姆斯·格兰特·达夫的大力鼓励。论点是,尽管帝国和军事条件使格兰特·达夫的研究成为可能,但把它简单地看作是殖民霸权的一个项目,而不是一个主要的、甚至是基础的智力生产和公共理性行为,这是错误的,它服从于世界性的文学世界,原则上,印度人并没有被排除在外。因此,本章提出了打破赛义德范式的理由,不仅仅是基于实证主义的理由,而是支持更细致的历史和更有洞察力的意识形态分析。这意味着要密切关注格兰特·达夫(Grant Duff)(以及他的《历史》一书)与东印度公司本身的斗争,后者的主要兴趣与其说是了解,不如说是保密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信