A FORMALISM CRITIQUE OF DJOKO PEKIK'S PAINTINGS ENTITLED GO TO HELL CROCODILE

A. Ayuningtari
{"title":"A FORMALISM CRITIQUE OF DJOKO PEKIK'S PAINTINGS ENTITLED GO TO HELL CROCODILE","authors":"A. Ayuningtari","doi":"10.26858/p.v7i2.35027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to explain the aesthetic aspects of Djoko Pekik's paintings entitled Go to Hell Crocodile. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. The approach step taken in this research is the art criticism approach with analytical interpretation using Feldman's formalism art criticism. The data was obtained through observation and literature studies. The subject of criticism in this research is a painting entitled Go to Hell Crocodile (2014) made by Djoko Pekik, a realist-expressive painter from Yogyakarta. To Feldman's critique structure, in this art criticism paper, there are four parts of explanations namely description, formal analysis, interpretation, and evaluation or decision. The research's results showed that there was a significant consistency in Djoko Pekik's paintings entitled Go to Hell Crocodile (2014) with his old work in 1998 entitled Berburu Celeng. This consistency is found in the concept of ideas, he brings up the phenomenon of Indonesian socio-politics issues. In addition, consistency is also found in visual concepts such as the selection of the main object's form, the supporting objects, and his unique expressive painting styles. The results of the observations also found some transformations in the visual aspects of Djoko Pekik's paintings, but some of these aspects did not change his style in a major way and this aspect could not even be known if the art enthusiast did not make in-depth observations.","PeriodicalId":329266,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL PAKARENA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL PAKARENA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/p.v7i2.35027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to explain the aesthetic aspects of Djoko Pekik's paintings entitled Go to Hell Crocodile. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. The approach step taken in this research is the art criticism approach with analytical interpretation using Feldman's formalism art criticism. The data was obtained through observation and literature studies. The subject of criticism in this research is a painting entitled Go to Hell Crocodile (2014) made by Djoko Pekik, a realist-expressive painter from Yogyakarta. To Feldman's critique structure, in this art criticism paper, there are four parts of explanations namely description, formal analysis, interpretation, and evaluation or decision. The research's results showed that there was a significant consistency in Djoko Pekik's paintings entitled Go to Hell Crocodile (2014) with his old work in 1998 entitled Berburu Celeng. This consistency is found in the concept of ideas, he brings up the phenomenon of Indonesian socio-politics issues. In addition, consistency is also found in visual concepts such as the selection of the main object's form, the supporting objects, and his unique expressive painting styles. The results of the observations also found some transformations in the visual aspects of Djoko Pekik's paintings, but some of these aspects did not change his style in a major way and this aspect could not even be known if the art enthusiast did not make in-depth observations.
对djoko pekik画作的形式主义批判,标题为“去地狱鳄鱼”
本研究旨在解释Djoko Pekik题为“去地狱鳄鱼”的画作的美学方面。本研究采用描述性定性研究方法。本研究采取的方法步骤是采用费尔德曼形式主义艺术批评的分析解释的艺术批评方法。数据通过观察和文献研究获得。本研究的批评对象是来自日惹的现实主义表现主义画家Djoko Pekik的一幅题为《去地狱鳄鱼》(Go to Hell Crocodile, 2014)的画作。对于费尔德曼的批评结构,在这篇艺术批评论文中,有四个部分的解释,即描述、形式分析、解释和评价或决定。研究结果显示,Djoko Pekik的画作《Go to Hell Crocodile》(2014)与他1998年的老作品《Berburu Celeng》有着显著的一致性。这种一致性发现在观念观念上,他提出了印尼社会政治问题的现象。此外,在主要对象形式的选择、辅助对象的选择、他独特的表现绘画风格等视觉观念上也有一致性。观察的结果也发现了Djoko Pekik的绘画在视觉方面的一些变化,但其中一些方面并没有很大的改变他的风格,如果艺术爱好者不深入观察,这方面甚至无法知道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信