Welfare Implications of Water Shortages: Higher Prices or Desalination

Yiğit Sağlam
{"title":"Welfare Implications of Water Shortages: Higher Prices or Desalination","authors":"Yiğit Sağlam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2271865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I evaluate the welfare implications of shortages in renewable resources, and investigate the effects of cross-subsidization on these shortages. I set up a stochastic dynamic programming model in which a benevolent central planner allocates the resource for multiple user-groups subject to revenue and resource constraints. The central planner also has access to an external source which can be used at a certain cost. The solution to the model gives the “optimal” sectoral prices, and the demand for the external source. I find out that saving net revenues during resource scarcity allows the planner to charge prices below average costs when the resource is abundant. Using water data, I conclude that cross-subsidizing agriculture does not have any significant effect on the frequency of shortages.","PeriodicalId":308822,"journal":{"name":"Water Sustainability eJournal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Sustainability eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2271865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, I evaluate the welfare implications of shortages in renewable resources, and investigate the effects of cross-subsidization on these shortages. I set up a stochastic dynamic programming model in which a benevolent central planner allocates the resource for multiple user-groups subject to revenue and resource constraints. The central planner also has access to an external source which can be used at a certain cost. The solution to the model gives the “optimal” sectoral prices, and the demand for the external source. I find out that saving net revenues during resource scarcity allows the planner to charge prices below average costs when the resource is abundant. Using water data, I conclude that cross-subsidizing agriculture does not have any significant effect on the frequency of shortages.
水资源短缺对福利的影响:更高的价格还是海水淡化
在本文中,我评估了可再生资源短缺对福利的影响,并研究了交叉补贴对这些短缺的影响。我建立了一个随机动态规划模型,在这个模型中,一个仁慈的中央计划者将资源分配给受收入和资源约束的多个用户群体。中央计划者还可以以一定的成本使用外部资源。该模型的解给出了“最优”部门价格,以及对外部来源的需求。我发现,在资源稀缺期间节省净收益,可以使计划者在资源充足时收取低于平均成本的价格。利用水资源数据,我得出结论,交叉补贴农业对短缺频率没有任何显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信