How to Unify All Schools of Thought in Social Science and Humanities into One Scientific School of Thought

James J. Wayne
{"title":"How to Unify All Schools of Thought in Social Science and Humanities into One Scientific School of Thought","authors":"James J. Wayne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3705664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are hundreds and thousands of schools of thought in social science and humanities, while there is only one school of thought in natural science. This paper investigates the question how to unify all schools of thought in social science and humanities into one scientific school of thought by transforming social science and humanities into subfields of physics. By being parts of physics, the scientific version of social science and humanities should allow only one school of thought logically and naturally. This paper will discuss what this scientific version of social science and humanities will look like and how it can be uniquely defined in terms of physics of human society, mathematics, methodology, history, facts, forecasting models, equilibrium values systems, and equilibrium solutions to normative problems. This paper should be useful for reconciling the current extremely polarized policy debates between the left and right around the world.","PeriodicalId":174014,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Decision Theory (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Decision Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3705664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are hundreds and thousands of schools of thought in social science and humanities, while there is only one school of thought in natural science. This paper investigates the question how to unify all schools of thought in social science and humanities into one scientific school of thought by transforming social science and humanities into subfields of physics. By being parts of physics, the scientific version of social science and humanities should allow only one school of thought logically and naturally. This paper will discuss what this scientific version of social science and humanities will look like and how it can be uniquely defined in terms of physics of human society, mathematics, methodology, history, facts, forecasting models, equilibrium values systems, and equilibrium solutions to normative problems. This paper should be useful for reconciling the current extremely polarized policy debates between the left and right around the world.
如何把社会科学和人文科学各学派统一为一个科学学派
社会科学和人文科学有成百上千的学派,而自然科学只有一个学派。本文探讨了如何把社会科学和人文科学转变为物理学的子领域,从而把社会科学和人文科学的各个学派统一为一个科学的思想流派。作为物理学的一部分,社会科学和人文科学的科学版本应该在逻辑上和自然上只允许一个学派。本文将讨论社会科学和人文科学的科学版本将会是什么样子,以及它如何在人类社会的物理学、数学、方法论、历史、事实、预测模型、平衡值系统和规范问题的平衡解决方案方面得到独特的定义。这篇文章应该有助于调和目前世界各地左派和右派之间极端分化的政策争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信