The Nation or the 'Local Organic Community'?: Ó Cadhain versus Ó Droighneáin

Fionntán de Brún
{"title":"The Nation or the 'Local Organic Community'?: Ó Cadhain versus Ó Droighneáin","authors":"Fionntán de Brún","doi":"10.54586/ovyq6662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A series of letters in the magazine An tUltach gives an important insight into the rural/urban dichotomy which has characterised Revivalist discourse. The Republicanism of the writer Máirtín Ó Cadhain (1906–70) is tempered by the knowledge that while the cultural identity of the Gaeltacht [Irish-speaking area] has been instated as the official national image, this image was at odds with the social reality of emigration and rural decline. The state’s need to centralise and standardise the Gaelic culture of the rural west was vehemently opposed by Ó Cadhain who felt that the local organic community was being supplanted by a vampiric corporate machine. Muiris Ó Droighneáin (1901–79) represents that section of Irish society in towns and cities who had embraced the ‘imagined’ linguistic community and corporate identity of the Republic and saw the need to replace the local with the national, particularly in his obsessive advocacy of standardised Irish. This paper will examine how the national Revivalist movement paradoxically displaced the integrity of local communal identity in which Gaelic culture found its most enduring refuge.","PeriodicalId":370965,"journal":{"name":"Studia Celto-Slavica","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Celto-Slavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54586/ovyq6662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A series of letters in the magazine An tUltach gives an important insight into the rural/urban dichotomy which has characterised Revivalist discourse. The Republicanism of the writer Máirtín Ó Cadhain (1906–70) is tempered by the knowledge that while the cultural identity of the Gaeltacht [Irish-speaking area] has been instated as the official national image, this image was at odds with the social reality of emigration and rural decline. The state’s need to centralise and standardise the Gaelic culture of the rural west was vehemently opposed by Ó Cadhain who felt that the local organic community was being supplanted by a vampiric corporate machine. Muiris Ó Droighneáin (1901–79) represents that section of Irish society in towns and cities who had embraced the ‘imagined’ linguistic community and corporate identity of the Republic and saw the need to replace the local with the national, particularly in his obsessive advocacy of standardised Irish. This paper will examine how the national Revivalist movement paradoxically displaced the integrity of local communal identity in which Gaelic culture found its most enduring refuge.
国家还是“当地有机社区”?: Ó Cadhain诉Ó Droighneáin
An tUltach杂志上的一系列信件对乡村/城市二分法提供了重要的见解,这种二分法是奋兴主义话语的特征。作家Máirtín Ó Cadhain(1906-70)的共和主义意识到,虽然盖尔语(爱尔兰语地区)的文化认同已被确立为官方的国家形象,但这种形象与移民和农村衰落的社会现实不符。国家需要集中和规范西部农村的盖尔文化,这遭到Ó Cadhain的强烈反对,他认为当地的有机社区正在被吸血鬼般的企业机器所取代。Muiris Ó Droighneáin(1901-79)代表了爱尔兰城镇社会的一部分,他们接受了“想象的”语言社区和共和国的企业身份,并看到了用国家取代地方的必要性,特别是在他对标准化爱尔兰语的痴迷倡导中。本文将研究民族复兴运动如何矛盾地取代了盖尔文化找到其最持久避难所的地方社区身份的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信