The Dangers of Being a Journalist: The Case of Turkey

Barış Çoban, Bora Ataman
{"title":"The Dangers of Being a Journalist: The Case of Turkey","authors":"Barış Çoban, Bora Ataman","doi":"10.33422/ntss.2019.08.493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journalism has increasingly become dysfunctional due to ‘new forms of censorship and repression, self-censorship, surveillance, monitoring and control, gatekeeping, propaganda/disinformation, acts of terror, anti-terror laws, the criminalization of encryption and/or anonymity, hate speech and harassment, and organized crime’ in so-called liberal democratic states (Carlsson & Pöyhtäri, 2017: 12). In fact, Turkey, in the front line with such practices, has recently turned into a dangerous country, where the rule of law, civil liberties and democratic governance are in sharp decline (WJP, 2018; The EIU, 2018). As confirmed by many international chronicles, reports and indexes, Turkey has now become more and more barren for democracy in general and journalism in particular. On the RSF Press Freedom Index 2018, Turkey is ranked 157th of 180 countries. In the last few years, more than 100 media outlets have been closed and 151 journalists and media workers have been put behind bars (TGS, 26 January 2018), while over 1000 journalists have been dismissed. In these circumstances, safety has become the primary problem in Turkey. According to “Freedom of the press 2017” report by the Freedom house, the sources of the threats are listed as: “heads of state: launching verbal attacks and lawsuits; trolls: abusing and threatening online; security forces: harassing, arresting and beating; violent groups: threatening attacks and death; judges: delivering draconian sentences; media owners: controlling the editorial line and job security”. In this study, we will first describe and second make an in-depth analysis of these threats in Turkey to present a more thorough understanding of the issues (e.g. freedom of thought, right to information, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press) at stake in the Turkish mediascape (Appadurai, 1990). The data will be gathered from the reports of Journalists’ Union of Turkey (TGS), Progressive Journalists’ Association (ÇGD), Bianet and several others. The time period of the study is limited to two years starting from the State of Emergency declared after the failed coup attempt of July 15, 2016 to the general elections of June 24, 2018. In the end, we will offer some safety strategies and tactics for the journalists living and working in dangerous zones like Turkey to discuss further.","PeriodicalId":193848,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on New Trends in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/ntss.2019.08.493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Journalism has increasingly become dysfunctional due to ‘new forms of censorship and repression, self-censorship, surveillance, monitoring and control, gatekeeping, propaganda/disinformation, acts of terror, anti-terror laws, the criminalization of encryption and/or anonymity, hate speech and harassment, and organized crime’ in so-called liberal democratic states (Carlsson & Pöyhtäri, 2017: 12). In fact, Turkey, in the front line with such practices, has recently turned into a dangerous country, where the rule of law, civil liberties and democratic governance are in sharp decline (WJP, 2018; The EIU, 2018). As confirmed by many international chronicles, reports and indexes, Turkey has now become more and more barren for democracy in general and journalism in particular. On the RSF Press Freedom Index 2018, Turkey is ranked 157th of 180 countries. In the last few years, more than 100 media outlets have been closed and 151 journalists and media workers have been put behind bars (TGS, 26 January 2018), while over 1000 journalists have been dismissed. In these circumstances, safety has become the primary problem in Turkey. According to “Freedom of the press 2017” report by the Freedom house, the sources of the threats are listed as: “heads of state: launching verbal attacks and lawsuits; trolls: abusing and threatening online; security forces: harassing, arresting and beating; violent groups: threatening attacks and death; judges: delivering draconian sentences; media owners: controlling the editorial line and job security”. In this study, we will first describe and second make an in-depth analysis of these threats in Turkey to present a more thorough understanding of the issues (e.g. freedom of thought, right to information, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press) at stake in the Turkish mediascape (Appadurai, 1990). The data will be gathered from the reports of Journalists’ Union of Turkey (TGS), Progressive Journalists’ Association (ÇGD), Bianet and several others. The time period of the study is limited to two years starting from the State of Emergency declared after the failed coup attempt of July 15, 2016 to the general elections of June 24, 2018. In the end, we will offer some safety strategies and tactics for the journalists living and working in dangerous zones like Turkey to discuss further.
记者的危险:土耳其的案例
在所谓的自由民主国家,由于“新形式的审查和压制、自我审查、监视、监视和控制、把关、宣传/虚假信息、恐怖行为、反恐法律、将加密和/或匿名定为刑事犯罪、仇恨言论和骚扰以及有组织犯罪”,新闻业越来越失调(Carlsson & Pöyhtäri, 2017: 12)。事实上,土耳其作为这种做法的前线,最近已经变成了一个危险的国家,法治,公民自由和民主治理正在急剧下降(WJP, 2018;经济学人智库,2018)。正如许多国际编年史、报道和指数所证实的那样,土耳其现在变得越来越缺乏民主,尤其是新闻业。在2018年RSF新闻自由指数中,土耳其在180个国家中排名第157位。在过去几年中,有100多家媒体被关闭,151名记者和媒体工作者被关进监狱(TGS, 2018年1月26日),1000多名记者被解雇。在这种情况下,安全已成为土耳其的首要问题。根据自由之家发布的《2017年新闻自由》报告,威胁的来源如下:“国家元首:发起口头攻击和诉讼;巨魔:在网上谩骂和威胁;安全部队:骚扰、逮捕和殴打;暴力团体:威胁袭击和死亡;法官:判重刑;媒体所有者:控制编辑路线和工作保障”。在本研究中,我们将首先描述,然后对土耳其的这些威胁进行深入分析,以更全面地了解土耳其媒体环境中面临的问题(例如思想自由、信息权、言论自由和新闻自由)(Appadurai, 1990)。数据将从土耳其记者联盟(TGS)、进步记者协会(ÇGD)、Bianet和其他几个组织的报告中收集。该研究的时间期限为两年,从2016年7月15日政变失败后宣布的紧急状态到2018年6月24日的大选。最后,我们将提供一些安全策略和策略,供在土耳其等危险地区生活和工作的记者进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信