Airspace Risk Management for UAVs A Framework for Optimising Detector Performance Standards and Airspace Traffic using JARUS SORA

Terrence L. Martin, Z. Huang, A. Mcfadyen
{"title":"Airspace Risk Management for UAVs A Framework for Optimising Detector Performance Standards and Airspace Traffic using JARUS SORA","authors":"Terrence L. Martin, Z. Huang, A. Mcfadyen","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Joint Authority for Rulemaking on UAS (JARUS) recently released a process for managing air and ground risk for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operations: the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) [1]. This paper focuses on the air risk element, where the challenge of balancing equipment performance for detect and avoid functions against the likelihood they will be needed (encounter rates) is further complicated by safety and costs implications. To date, attempts to achieve this balance have largely been conducted using qualitative measures. The problem with this approach is that it risks superimposing unnecessary cost burdens on industry without transparent evidence it is delivering the perceived safety benefit, or conversely, the process results in under-estimates for encounter rates with inadequate performance standards stipulated. To address this issue, we introduce a Bayesian framework that explicitly links encounter rate exposure, detection performance, cost and safety. We then detail how the framework can be deployed to appropriately match airspace characteristics with suitable equipment performance levels, whilst optimising safety and cost. As part of our testing regime, we identified that a mis-representation of actual traffic encounter rates creates compounding implications for detector performance standards and safety. Accordingly, we incorporate our efforts to characterise a region of Australian airspace, and contrast it with a the qualitative characterisation methods employed within the SORA.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The Joint Authority for Rulemaking on UAS (JARUS) recently released a process for managing air and ground risk for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operations: the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) [1]. This paper focuses on the air risk element, where the challenge of balancing equipment performance for detect and avoid functions against the likelihood they will be needed (encounter rates) is further complicated by safety and costs implications. To date, attempts to achieve this balance have largely been conducted using qualitative measures. The problem with this approach is that it risks superimposing unnecessary cost burdens on industry without transparent evidence it is delivering the perceived safety benefit, or conversely, the process results in under-estimates for encounter rates with inadequate performance standards stipulated. To address this issue, we introduce a Bayesian framework that explicitly links encounter rate exposure, detection performance, cost and safety. We then detail how the framework can be deployed to appropriately match airspace characteristics with suitable equipment performance levels, whilst optimising safety and cost. As part of our testing regime, we identified that a mis-representation of actual traffic encounter rates creates compounding implications for detector performance standards and safety. Accordingly, we incorporate our efforts to characterise a region of Australian airspace, and contrast it with a the qualitative characterisation methods employed within the SORA.
无人机空域风险管理:利用JARUS SORA优化探测器性能标准和空域交通的框架
美国无人机联合规则制定机构(JARUS)最近发布了一项管理无人机(UAV)作战空中和地面风险的流程:特定作战风险评估(SORA)[1]。本文的重点是空气风险因素,其中平衡设备性能的检测和避免功能与可能需要的可能性(遭遇率)的挑战因安全和成本影响而进一步复杂化。迄今为止,实现这一平衡的努力主要是使用定性措施。这种方法的问题在于,它可能会给行业带来不必要的成本负担,而没有透明的证据表明它正在提供可感知的安全效益,或者相反,该过程会在规定的性能标准不充分的情况下导致对相遇率的低估。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一个贝叶斯框架,明确地将遭遇率暴露、检测性能、成本和安全性联系起来。然后,我们详细介绍了如何部署该框架,以适当地将空域特征与合适的设备性能水平相匹配,同时优化安全性和成本。作为我们测试制度的一部分,我们发现对实际交通事故率的错误表示会对检测器的性能标准和安全性产生复杂的影响。因此,我们结合我们的努力来描述澳大利亚空域的一个区域,并将其与SORA中使用的定性描述方法进行对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信