EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING RAPID TEST AS A SUPPORT OF THE RESULTS OF THE COVID-19 DIAGNOSIS

Runtun Retno Pamungkas, M. N. Nugroho, I. Jus’at
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING RAPID TEST AS A SUPPORT OF THE RESULTS OF THE COVID-19 DIAGNOSIS","authors":"Runtun Retno Pamungkas, M. N. Nugroho, I. Jus’at","doi":"10.31933/dijemss.v3i4.1252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19, a disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has become a concern of public emergencies around the world. Originating in Wuhan, China has spread globally so rapidly that it can cause millions of deaths worldwide. The purpose and objective of this research is to determine the effectiveness of using the Rapid test in supporting the results of a Covid-19 diagnosis. The study sample described 233 people, with categories OTG, ODP, PDP or Confirm, who were taken from March 2020-June 2020. Although the diagnosis of acute patients with PCR-swabs has become the gold standard in diagnosing Covid-19, it is also necessary to have a Rapid antibody test blood) in the assessment of cases and antibody responses to specific groups of individuals. In this study, a specific SARS-CoV-2 early detection rapid test (within 15 minutes) was obtained. The results showed a sensitivity of 15.33% and a specificity of 51.19% based on the results of the Rapid test for antibodies (blood) to the Rapid test antigen (swab / PCR), although many negative results were found in the first week after infection . In addition, data analysis was also carried out using the Three-Box Method to understand understanding of the knowledge, actions and actions of respondents in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The findings of this research are that knowledge is in good category, attitude is in high category and action is in good category. data analysis was also carried out using the Three-Box Method to understand understanding of the knowledge, actions and actions of respondents in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The findings of this research are that knowledge is in good category, attitude is in high category and action is in good category. data analysis was also carried out using the Three-Box Method to understand understanding of the knowledge, actions and actions of respondents in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The findings of this research are that knowledge is in good category, attitude is in high category and action is in good category.","PeriodicalId":357147,"journal":{"name":"Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v3i4.1252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19, a disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has become a concern of public emergencies around the world. Originating in Wuhan, China has spread globally so rapidly that it can cause millions of deaths worldwide. The purpose and objective of this research is to determine the effectiveness of using the Rapid test in supporting the results of a Covid-19 diagnosis. The study sample described 233 people, with categories OTG, ODP, PDP or Confirm, who were taken from March 2020-June 2020. Although the diagnosis of acute patients with PCR-swabs has become the gold standard in diagnosing Covid-19, it is also necessary to have a Rapid antibody test blood) in the assessment of cases and antibody responses to specific groups of individuals. In this study, a specific SARS-CoV-2 early detection rapid test (within 15 minutes) was obtained. The results showed a sensitivity of 15.33% and a specificity of 51.19% based on the results of the Rapid test for antibodies (blood) to the Rapid test antigen (swab / PCR), although many negative results were found in the first week after infection . In addition, data analysis was also carried out using the Three-Box Method to understand understanding of the knowledge, actions and actions of respondents in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The findings of this research are that knowledge is in good category, attitude is in high category and action is in good category. data analysis was also carried out using the Three-Box Method to understand understanding of the knowledge, actions and actions of respondents in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The findings of this research are that knowledge is in good category, attitude is in high category and action is in good category. data analysis was also carried out using the Three-Box Method to understand understanding of the knowledge, actions and actions of respondents in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. The findings of this research are that knowledge is in good category, attitude is in high category and action is in good category.
评价快速检测作为COVID-19诊断结果支持的有效性
COVID-19是由SARS-CoV-2引起的疾病,已成为全球关注的突发公共事件。从武汉开始,中国迅速蔓延到全球,可能导致全球数百万人死亡。本研究的目的和目标是确定使用快速检测来支持Covid-19诊断结果的有效性。该研究样本描述了从2020年3月至2020年6月采集的233人,分类为OTG, ODP, PDP或Confirm。尽管用pcr拭子诊断急性患者已成为诊断Covid-19的金标准,但在评估病例和对特定人群的抗体反应时,也有必要进行快速抗体检测(血液)。本研究获得了特异性的SARS-CoV-2早期快速检测方法(15分钟内)。结果显示,尽管在感染后第1周内发现许多阴性结果,但基于快速检测抗原抗体(血)(拭子/ PCR)结果的敏感性为15.33%,特异性为51.19%。此外,还使用三盒法进行数据分析,了解受访者在Covid-19大流行时代的知识,行动和行动的理解。本研究结果表明:知识为好类,态度为高类,行动为好类。采用三盒法进行数据分析,了解受访者对新冠肺炎大流行时代的知识、行动和行动的理解。本研究结果表明:知识为好类,态度为高类,行动为好类。采用三盒法进行数据分析,了解受访者对新冠肺炎大流行时代的知识、行动和行动的理解。本研究结果表明:知识为好类,态度为高类,行动为好类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信