Safety And Efficacy Of Two Days Of Rush Immunotherapy Among Patients With Allergic Rhinitis And Asthma

P. Seema, B. G. Parasuramalu, M. Rajanna
{"title":"Safety And Efficacy Of Two Days Of Rush Immunotherapy Among Patients With Allergic Rhinitis And Asthma","authors":"P. Seema, B. G. Parasuramalu, M. Rajanna","doi":"10.5580/2aca","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was done to assess the safety and efficacy of rush immunotherapy (RIT), and was conducted in the Allergy Centre of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital & Research Centre, Bangalore, India. Twenty patients in the age group of 18-50 years were included, of which thirteen patients had allergic rhinitis, and seven patients had allergic rhinitis with asthma. All of these patients were positive for skin prick test for house dust, dust mites, tree pollens, grass pollens, and weed pollens, either singly or in combination. They received RIT as per the protocol. Among these patients, the safety of RIT was assessed based on reactions during RIT and efficacy was assessed by estimating total serum IgE and IgG at baseline, after two weeks, and after six weeks. Local reactions were observed in five patients, which subsided without any medication. Systemic reaction was observed only in one patient following a 9 injection on Day 2. This patient responded satisfactorily to Inj. Chlorpheniramine maleate, Inj. Hydrocortisone, and Oxygen inhalation and completed RIT. Late systemic reactions were not noted in any of the patients. Estimation of total serum IgE showed a significant reduction and total serum IgG showed a significant increase after six weeks. It was concluded that rush immunotherapy was tolerated by most patients with a systemic reaction rate comparable to conventional immunotherapy. All patients were able to reach maintenance dose months sooner than weekly schedules. With refinement of this procedure, Rush Immunotherapy may become a widely used method for desensitizing patients with inhalant allergens, and could make immunotherapy less expensive and more convenient to the patients.","PeriodicalId":161194,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2aca","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was done to assess the safety and efficacy of rush immunotherapy (RIT), and was conducted in the Allergy Centre of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital & Research Centre, Bangalore, India. Twenty patients in the age group of 18-50 years were included, of which thirteen patients had allergic rhinitis, and seven patients had allergic rhinitis with asthma. All of these patients were positive for skin prick test for house dust, dust mites, tree pollens, grass pollens, and weed pollens, either singly or in combination. They received RIT as per the protocol. Among these patients, the safety of RIT was assessed based on reactions during RIT and efficacy was assessed by estimating total serum IgE and IgG at baseline, after two weeks, and after six weeks. Local reactions were observed in five patients, which subsided without any medication. Systemic reaction was observed only in one patient following a 9 injection on Day 2. This patient responded satisfactorily to Inj. Chlorpheniramine maleate, Inj. Hydrocortisone, and Oxygen inhalation and completed RIT. Late systemic reactions were not noted in any of the patients. Estimation of total serum IgE showed a significant reduction and total serum IgG showed a significant increase after six weeks. It was concluded that rush immunotherapy was tolerated by most patients with a systemic reaction rate comparable to conventional immunotherapy. All patients were able to reach maintenance dose months sooner than weekly schedules. With refinement of this procedure, Rush Immunotherapy may become a widely used method for desensitizing patients with inhalant allergens, and could make immunotherapy less expensive and more convenient to the patients.
过敏性鼻炎和哮喘患者两天Rush免疫治疗的安全性和有效性
本研究是为了评估紧急免疫疗法(RIT)的安全性和有效性,在印度班加罗尔Kempegowda医学科学研究所医院和研究中心过敏中心进行的。纳入年龄在18-50岁的20例患者,其中过敏性鼻炎13例,过敏性鼻炎合并哮喘7例。所有患者的室内灰尘、尘螨、树木花粉、草花粉和杂草花粉的皮肤点刺试验均呈阳性,或单独或联合阳性。他们按照协议接受了RIT。在这些患者中,根据RIT期间的反应评估RIT的安全性,并通过评估基线、两周和六周后的血清总IgE和IgG来评估有效性。5例患者局部反应消退,无需任何药物治疗。仅1例患者在第2天注射9后出现全身反应。这个病人对注射有满意的反应。注射马来酸氯苯那敏。氢化可的松,吸氧,完成RIT。所有患者均未发现晚期全身反应。6周后,血清总IgE值显著降低,血清总IgG值显著升高。结论是,大多数患者耐受快速免疫治疗,全身反应率与常规免疫治疗相当。所有患者都能比每周计划早几个月达到维持剂量。随着该方法的改进,Rush免疫疗法可能成为一种广泛应用于吸入性过敏原患者脱敏的方法,并且可以使免疫疗法更便宜,更方便患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信