What predicts adult immigrants’ engagement in host language training programmes: social class, forms of capital, or academic self-efficacy?

M. Reichenberg
{"title":"What predicts adult immigrants’ engagement in host language training programmes: social class, forms of capital, or academic self-efficacy?","authors":"M. Reichenberg","doi":"10.18413/2313-8971-2021-7-3-0-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Host language training for immigrants continues to be a debated issue. Beyond language skills, immigrants’ engagement in language training has seldom been studied. Purpose: The present study predicted student engagement in Swedish host language training programmes. Predictors of engagement include (a) socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors (sex, socioeconomic groupings); (b) human capital; (c) social capital; and (d) academic self-efficacy. Methodology and methods: The data consist of a survey with 186 participants from one language training centre (i.e., non-random). Results: The participants reported a high level of engagement in language training. The study used linear regression and structural equation modelling. First, the study indicates (unexpectedly) that students with low education were more engaged than highly educated students. Second, students with greater social capital had greater engagement. Third, academic self-efficacy made the largest positive difference in student engagement. Conclusions: The study concludes with support for theories in immigration research and adult education, with the exception of the unexpected finding.","PeriodicalId":156612,"journal":{"name":"Research Result Pedagogy and Psychology Of Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Result Pedagogy and Psychology Of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8971-2021-7-3-0-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Host language training for immigrants continues to be a debated issue. Beyond language skills, immigrants’ engagement in language training has seldom been studied. Purpose: The present study predicted student engagement in Swedish host language training programmes. Predictors of engagement include (a) socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors (sex, socioeconomic groupings); (b) human capital; (c) social capital; and (d) academic self-efficacy. Methodology and methods: The data consist of a survey with 186 participants from one language training centre (i.e., non-random). Results: The participants reported a high level of engagement in language training. The study used linear regression and structural equation modelling. First, the study indicates (unexpectedly) that students with low education were more engaged than highly educated students. Second, students with greater social capital had greater engagement. Third, academic self-efficacy made the largest positive difference in student engagement. Conclusions: The study concludes with support for theories in immigration research and adult education, with the exception of the unexpected finding.
是什么预测成年移民参与东道国语言培训项目:社会阶层、资本形式还是学术自我效能?
介绍。移民的母语培训一直是一个有争议的问题。除了语言技能之外,移民参与语言培训的研究很少。目的:本研究预测学生参与瑞典主语培训项目。参与的预测因素包括(a)社会经济和社会人口因素(性别、社会经济群体);(b)人力资本;(c)社会资本;(d)学业自我效能。方法和方法:数据包括对来自一个语言培训中心(即非随机)的186名参与者的调查。结果:参与者对语言训练的投入程度较高。本研究采用线性回归和结构方程模型。首先,该研究(出乎意料地)表明,受教育程度低的学生比受教育程度高的学生更投入。第二,社会资本越大的学生参与程度越高。第三,学业自我效能对学生投入产生最大的正向影响。结论:本研究的结论支持移民研究和成人教育的理论,除了意外的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信