Pola Pemilihan Asimetris dalam Pemilihan Umum sebagai Solusi Transisi Demokrasi di Masa Pandemi

Sun Fatayati, Ahmad Gelora Mahardika
{"title":"Pola Pemilihan Asimetris dalam Pemilihan Umum sebagai Solusi Transisi Demokrasi di Masa Pandemi","authors":"Sun Fatayati, Ahmad Gelora Mahardika","doi":"10.33367/ijhass.v3i2.3100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The covid-19 pandemic outbreak that has occurred in Indonesia since March 2020 has forced the Government to postpone the simultaneous Regional Head Election which is planned to be held in September 2020. The problem is that the norms governing the implementation of Pilkada in September are written concretely in Law Number 10 of Year In 2016, the implication is that the government only has two options related to simultaneous regional elections in the middle of a pandemic, namely to postpone or continue implementing it with the risk of voters being infected with an outbreak. The government finally decided to postpone through Government Regulation in lieu of Law Number 2 of 2020 which in one article stated that the implementation of the Pilkada was carried out in December 2020. However, these changes were only temporary and had high risks, this was due to concerns. related to the implementation of elections in the midst of an outbreak and there are concerns if the outbreak occurs in the national election. Therefore, the change in the selection method with the asymmetrical selection model is the right alternative solution to be applied in the midst of a pandemic outbreak. The research method in this article is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that changes in the method of selection can be made and it is not against the law.","PeriodicalId":429105,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33367/ijhass.v3i2.3100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The covid-19 pandemic outbreak that has occurred in Indonesia since March 2020 has forced the Government to postpone the simultaneous Regional Head Election which is planned to be held in September 2020. The problem is that the norms governing the implementation of Pilkada in September are written concretely in Law Number 10 of Year In 2016, the implication is that the government only has two options related to simultaneous regional elections in the middle of a pandemic, namely to postpone or continue implementing it with the risk of voters being infected with an outbreak. The government finally decided to postpone through Government Regulation in lieu of Law Number 2 of 2020 which in one article stated that the implementation of the Pilkada was carried out in December 2020. However, these changes were only temporary and had high risks, this was due to concerns. related to the implementation of elections in the midst of an outbreak and there are concerns if the outbreak occurs in the national election. Therefore, the change in the selection method with the asymmetrical selection model is the right alternative solution to be applied in the midst of a pandemic outbreak. The research method in this article is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that changes in the method of selection can be made and it is not against the law.
选举中的非对称选择模式,作为大流行民主过渡的解决方案
自2020年3月以来,印度尼西亚爆发了covid-19大流行疫情,迫使政府推迟了原计划于2020年9月同时举行的地区领导人选举。问题是,2016年第10号法律明确规定了9月份实施Pilkada的规范,这意味着政府在大流行期间与同时进行地区选举有关的选择只有两种,即推迟或继续实施,但选民有可能感染疫情。政府最终决定通过政府条例代替2020年第2号法律推迟实施,该法律在一篇文章中指出,Pilkada将于2020年12月实施。然而,这些变化只是暂时的,并且有很高的风险,这是由于关注。与疫情期间举行选举有关,人们担心疫情是否发生在全国选举期间。因此,使用不对称选择模型改变选择方法是在大流行爆发期间应用的正确替代解决方案。本文的研究方法是规范法学。本研究的结论是,选择方法的改变是可以的,而且并不违反法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信