Comparison of steady state and elitist selection genetic algorithms

Shizhen, C. Zhouyang
{"title":"Comparison of steady state and elitist selection genetic algorithms","authors":"Shizhen, C. Zhouyang","doi":"10.1109/ICIMA.2004.1384245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is proposed that the comparison problem of two models of the genetic algorithm, the steady state genetic algorithm and the elitist selection genetic algorithm. The convergence speed, on-line and off-line performance of the hvo algorithms in different environments are compared. It is experimentally shown that the steady state genetic algorithm is a simple, effective genetic algorithm. The steady state genetic algorithm runs well in low-dimensional environment, especially its good on-line performance. On the other hand the elitist selection genetic algorithm runs well in highdimensional environment, it has good capability in searching optimal value in a big space. The diffmnce between the searching ability of two algorithms was explained by the theory of Implicit Parallelism. The difference between the two algorithms on-line performances was explained by the difference ways of reproduction the two models used.","PeriodicalId":375056,"journal":{"name":"2004 International Conference on Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 International Conference on Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMA.2004.1384245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

It is proposed that the comparison problem of two models of the genetic algorithm, the steady state genetic algorithm and the elitist selection genetic algorithm. The convergence speed, on-line and off-line performance of the hvo algorithms in different environments are compared. It is experimentally shown that the steady state genetic algorithm is a simple, effective genetic algorithm. The steady state genetic algorithm runs well in low-dimensional environment, especially its good on-line performance. On the other hand the elitist selection genetic algorithm runs well in highdimensional environment, it has good capability in searching optimal value in a big space. The diffmnce between the searching ability of two algorithms was explained by the theory of Implicit Parallelism. The difference between the two algorithms on-line performances was explained by the difference ways of reproduction the two models used.
稳态遗传算法与精英选择遗传算法的比较
提出了遗传算法的两种模型——稳态遗传算法和精英选择遗传算法的比较问题。比较了hvo算法在不同环境下的收敛速度、在线和离线性能。实验表明,稳态遗传算法是一种简单、有效的遗传算法。稳态遗传算法在低维环境下运行良好,尤其具有良好的在线性能。另一方面,精英选择遗传算法在高维环境下运行良好,具有在大空间内搜索最优值的良好能力。用隐式并行理论解释了两种算法搜索能力的差异。两种算法在线性能的差异可以用两种模型的不同再现方式来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书