Singapore Art History as a History of Mobilities

Wei Hao Goh
{"title":"Singapore Art History as a History of Mobilities","authors":"Wei Hao Goh","doi":"10.1080/00233609.2022.2145351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Moving away from the study of the history of art using place-bound and ‘rational' terms, this article examines how the different forms of mobilities practiced by Singaporean artists have shaped their artworks, practices and identities. This is achieved through a study of artists who practiced ‘unconventional’ forms of mobilities: Suzann Victor, an ‘unofficial exile’ who moved to Sydney due to the fallout from the Brother Cane incident, which made it difficult for her to continue to practice in Singapore; Jimmy Ong, who shifted his practice to the United States to lead a “domestic life” with his former husband and Gilles Massot, a French-born artist who moved to Singapore to become an “Other.” Specifically, the paper seeks to answer: What are the different types of mobilities practiced by the artists? How do these mobilities impact their practice? How are these mobilities and their impacts perceptible in the artworks? What are the ways that these mobilities differ from the ones that are typically studied in canonical art history? In this paper, the artworks are studied as ‘fluid spaces' that are shaped by the myriad forms of mobilities practiced by the artists – many of which cannot be described as completely ‘rational – rather than the product of a single form of mobility. The aim is to shift our study of art away from place-bound and ‘rational’ concepts towards the transience of the artists and the borderless nature of artistic influences and ideologies.","PeriodicalId":164200,"journal":{"name":"Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2022.2145351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Moving away from the study of the history of art using place-bound and ‘rational' terms, this article examines how the different forms of mobilities practiced by Singaporean artists have shaped their artworks, practices and identities. This is achieved through a study of artists who practiced ‘unconventional’ forms of mobilities: Suzann Victor, an ‘unofficial exile’ who moved to Sydney due to the fallout from the Brother Cane incident, which made it difficult for her to continue to practice in Singapore; Jimmy Ong, who shifted his practice to the United States to lead a “domestic life” with his former husband and Gilles Massot, a French-born artist who moved to Singapore to become an “Other.” Specifically, the paper seeks to answer: What are the different types of mobilities practiced by the artists? How do these mobilities impact their practice? How are these mobilities and their impacts perceptible in the artworks? What are the ways that these mobilities differ from the ones that are typically studied in canonical art history? In this paper, the artworks are studied as ‘fluid spaces' that are shaped by the myriad forms of mobilities practiced by the artists – many of which cannot be described as completely ‘rational – rather than the product of a single form of mobility. The aim is to shift our study of art away from place-bound and ‘rational’ concepts towards the transience of the artists and the borderless nature of artistic influences and ideologies.
作为流动史的新加坡艺术史
本文不再用地域约束和“理性”的术语来研究艺术史,而是探讨了新加坡艺术家所实践的不同形式的流动如何塑造了他们的艺术作品、实践和身份。这是通过对实践“非常规”流动形式的艺术家的研究来实现的:苏珊娜·维克多,一个“非官方流亡者”,由于凯恩兄弟事件的影响,她搬到了悉尼,这使得她很难继续在新加坡练习;吉米·翁(Jimmy Ong),他将自己的作品转移到美国,与前夫和法国出生的艺术家吉尔·马索(Gilles Massot)过着“家庭生活”,后者搬到了新加坡,成为了“他者”。具体来说,本文试图回答:艺术家们实践的不同类型的移动是什么?这些流动性如何影响他们的实践?这些移动和它们的影响如何在艺术作品中被感知?这些移动性与经典艺术史中典型研究的移动性有何不同?在本文中,艺术作品被研究为“流动空间”,由艺术家实践的无数形式的移动塑造而成,其中许多不能被描述为完全“理性的”,而不是单一形式的移动产物。其目的是将我们对艺术的研究从地域限制和“理性”概念转向艺术家的短暂性和艺术影响和意识形态的无国界性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信