Is it possible to turn the "upbringing" from Cinderella into a princess?

V. Rozin
{"title":"Is it possible to turn the \"upbringing\" from Cinderella into a princess?","authors":"V. Rozin","doi":"10.7256/2454-0676.2022.2.38245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article discusses the situation with education in modern culture and pedagogy, raises the question of the reasons for the decline in interest in education and the possibility of its revival in the near future. The meanings of education (widely understood education, controlled development, inclusion in culture) are considered. Two conditions of the conceivability of the traditional understanding of education are analyzed. Firstly, it is the principle of \"epistemological transparency\" (according to it, the teacher knows the laws of student development and the requirements that will be imposed on him at the exit of education-upbringing), which allows to determine the goals and content of education-upbringing, as well as methods of education.   Secondly, the \"deterministic\" principle: the development of a young person can be directed in the direction desired by the state, society and school, while blocking the student's activity leading in the wrong direction. It is argued that currently both of these conditions are not met, which forms a problem for education. Social reality is increasingly thought of as pluralistic, complex and uncertain; and determination in the field of education is becoming less and less, on the contrary, the principles of variability, the need to take into account different types of personality and divergent trajectories of their development and evolution are rising to the shield. The installations of a new concept of education, taking into account modern challenges of the time and sociality, are considered. According to the author, education should satisfy the \"environmental approach\", \"personalistic\" and \"reflexive-conceptual\".\n","PeriodicalId":259901,"journal":{"name":"Педагогика и просвещение","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Педагогика и просвещение","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2022.2.38245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the situation with education in modern culture and pedagogy, raises the question of the reasons for the decline in interest in education and the possibility of its revival in the near future. The meanings of education (widely understood education, controlled development, inclusion in culture) are considered. Two conditions of the conceivability of the traditional understanding of education are analyzed. Firstly, it is the principle of "epistemological transparency" (according to it, the teacher knows the laws of student development and the requirements that will be imposed on him at the exit of education-upbringing), which allows to determine the goals and content of education-upbringing, as well as methods of education.   Secondly, the "deterministic" principle: the development of a young person can be directed in the direction desired by the state, society and school, while blocking the student's activity leading in the wrong direction. It is argued that currently both of these conditions are not met, which forms a problem for education. Social reality is increasingly thought of as pluralistic, complex and uncertain; and determination in the field of education is becoming less and less, on the contrary, the principles of variability, the need to take into account different types of personality and divergent trajectories of their development and evolution are rising to the shield. The installations of a new concept of education, taking into account modern challenges of the time and sociality, are considered. According to the author, education should satisfy the "environmental approach", "personalistic" and "reflexive-conceptual".
有可能把灰姑娘的“教养”变成公主吗?
本文讨论了教育在现代文化和教育学中的现状,提出了教育兴趣下降的原因以及在不久的将来教育可能复兴的问题。教育的含义(广泛理解的教育,控制发展,融入文化)被考虑。分析了传统教育观念具有可想象性的两个条件。首先,是“认识论透明”原则(根据这一原则,教师知道学生发展的规律和在教育培养的退出时对他的要求),可以确定教育培养的目标和内容,以及教育的方法。第二,“决定论”原则:年轻人的发展可以朝着国家、社会和学校所希望的方向发展,同时阻止学生的活动走向错误的方向。有人认为,目前这两个条件都不满足,这对教育形成了一个问题。社会现实越来越被认为是多元的、复杂的和不确定的;而在教育领域的决心正变得越来越少,相反,可变性的原则,需要考虑到不同类型的人格及其发展和演变的不同轨迹正在上升到盾牌。考虑到时代和社会的现代挑战,建立一种新的教育概念。笔者认为,教育应满足“环境方法”、“个人主义”和“反思-概念”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信