Interfacial micro gaps between dentin bases and hard setting calcium hydroxide liner: A scanning electron microscopy study

Rabihah Alawi, A. Lotfy, Amalina Zakaria, S. Masudi, Nor Aidaniza Abdul Muttlib
{"title":"Interfacial micro gaps between dentin bases and hard setting calcium hydroxide liner: A scanning electron microscopy study","authors":"Rabihah Alawi, A. Lotfy, Amalina Zakaria, S. Masudi, Nor Aidaniza Abdul Muttlib","doi":"10.4103/dmr.dmr_44_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study is aimed to investigate interfacial micro gaps between bases and hard setting calcium hydroxide liner. Materials and Methods: Twelve sound extracted human maxillary premolars were selected and immersed in 0.1% thymol solution. Samples were subjected to Class I cavity preparations with the width of 2.5 mm buccolingually, 3 mm mesiodistally, and 2 mm depth from the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ). The cavities were lined with hard setting calcium hydroxide lining (Dycal®), (Dentsply, USA) and then divided randomly into two groups. The cavities were restored with smart dentin replacement (SDR®), (Dentsply, Germany) and glass ionomer cement Ketac™ N100 (3M ESPE, USA) for Group 1 and 2, respectively, (n = 6 for each group) up to DEJ level. All samples were then packed with composite resin. Samples were cut longitudinally using a hard tissue cutter (Exact, Japan) and sanded with increasing grit sandpaper (#320, #500, #800, and #1200) for 30 s each and subjected for interfacial micro gaps analysis using scanning electron microscopy. Results: There was a significant difference of micro gap formation between two groups of base materials and hard setting calcium hydroxide (Dycal®) (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Lesser micro gap between Dycal® and SDR® compared to Dycal® and Ketac™ N100 suggested SDR® as a better base material to be used with Dycal® for deep caries management.","PeriodicalId":413497,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry and Medical Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/dmr.dmr_44_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study is aimed to investigate interfacial micro gaps between bases and hard setting calcium hydroxide liner. Materials and Methods: Twelve sound extracted human maxillary premolars were selected and immersed in 0.1% thymol solution. Samples were subjected to Class I cavity preparations with the width of 2.5 mm buccolingually, 3 mm mesiodistally, and 2 mm depth from the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ). The cavities were lined with hard setting calcium hydroxide lining (Dycal®), (Dentsply, USA) and then divided randomly into two groups. The cavities were restored with smart dentin replacement (SDR®), (Dentsply, Germany) and glass ionomer cement Ketac™ N100 (3M ESPE, USA) for Group 1 and 2, respectively, (n = 6 for each group) up to DEJ level. All samples were then packed with composite resin. Samples were cut longitudinally using a hard tissue cutter (Exact, Japan) and sanded with increasing grit sandpaper (#320, #500, #800, and #1200) for 30 s each and subjected for interfacial micro gaps analysis using scanning electron microscopy. Results: There was a significant difference of micro gap formation between two groups of base materials and hard setting calcium hydroxide (Dycal®) (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Lesser micro gap between Dycal® and SDR® compared to Dycal® and Ketac™ N100 suggested SDR® as a better base material to be used with Dycal® for deep caries management.
牙本质基底与坚硬氢氧化钙衬垫之间的界面微间隙:扫描电镜研究
目的:研究碱基与硬质氢氧化钙衬垫之间的界面微间隙。材料与方法:选择12颗声音提取的人上颌前磨牙,浸泡在0.1%百里酚溶液中。样品进行I类空腔制备,其宽度为牙本质-牙釉质交界处(DEJ),纵向为2.5 mm,中纵向为3 mm,深度为2 mm。采用硬质氢氧化钙衬里(Dycal®),(Dentsply, USA),然后随机分为两组。第1组和第2组分别使用智能牙本质替代物(SDR®)(Dentsply,德国)和玻璃离子水泥Ketac™N100 (3M ESPE,美国)修复牙槽,每组n = 6)至DEJ水平。然后用复合树脂填充所有样品。使用硬组织切割机(Exact,日本)纵向切割样品,并用增加砂纸(#320,#500,#800和#1200)进行打磨,每次30秒,并使用扫描电子显微镜进行界面微间隙分析。结果:两组基材与硬质氢氧化钙(Dycal®)的微间隙形成差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与Dycal®和Ketac™N100相比,Dycal®和SDR®之间的微间隙较小,这表明SDR®是与Dycal®一起用于深度龋病治疗的更好的基础材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信