On the Relative Importance of Landscape Color Evaluation Items for Urban Landscape Improvement

Miok Lee, J. Choi, L. Lee
{"title":"On the Relative Importance of Landscape Color Evaluation Items for Urban Landscape Improvement","authors":"Miok Lee, J. Choi, L. Lee","doi":"10.21447/jusre.2023.14.2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As color is a visually significant factor among the design elements that make up the urban landscape image, a landscape color plan is being established to improve the urban image through various related policies considering landscape color. This study aims to propose criteria for landscape color planning by selecting items that should be important when establishing landscape color plans that were not covered in previous studies, and analyzing the importance among evaluation items of selected evaluation items. As a result of the study, first, the evaluation items leaked from the research literature related to landscape color were reclassified and 41 items were derived through FGI. Second, 41 evaluation items were classified into 4 types, and were readjusted to 16 items through discussion and survey analysis. Third, as a result of analyzing using AHP, importance was analyzed in the order of harmony(.394)> continuity(.257)> aesthetics(.193)> symbolism(.156) in the major classification, and it was confirmed that the pairwise comparison had reasonable consistency. As a result of the relative importance analysis among evaluation items, the priority considering important weights was “: Harmony with surrounding natural environment> Harmonization with adjacent buildings> Improvement of relationship between landscape elements> Harmonious and continuous landscape”. Most of the evaluation items included in harmony rank high, and the items included in symbolism generally rank low.","PeriodicalId":253974,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of Urban Policies","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of Urban Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21447/jusre.2023.14.2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As color is a visually significant factor among the design elements that make up the urban landscape image, a landscape color plan is being established to improve the urban image through various related policies considering landscape color. This study aims to propose criteria for landscape color planning by selecting items that should be important when establishing landscape color plans that were not covered in previous studies, and analyzing the importance among evaluation items of selected evaluation items. As a result of the study, first, the evaluation items leaked from the research literature related to landscape color were reclassified and 41 items were derived through FGI. Second, 41 evaluation items were classified into 4 types, and were readjusted to 16 items through discussion and survey analysis. Third, as a result of analyzing using AHP, importance was analyzed in the order of harmony(.394)> continuity(.257)> aesthetics(.193)> symbolism(.156) in the major classification, and it was confirmed that the pairwise comparison had reasonable consistency. As a result of the relative importance analysis among evaluation items, the priority considering important weights was “: Harmony with surrounding natural environment> Harmonization with adjacent buildings> Improvement of relationship between landscape elements> Harmonious and continuous landscape”. Most of the evaluation items included in harmony rank high, and the items included in symbolism generally rank low.
景观色彩评价项目在城市景观改善中的相对重要性
在构成城市景观形象的设计要素中,色彩是视觉上的重要因素,因此,我们正在制定景观色彩规划,通过考虑到景观色彩的各种相关政策来改善城市形象。本研究旨在通过选择在制定景观色彩方案时应重视的、在以往研究中未涉及的项目,并分析所选评价项目之间的重要性,提出景观色彩规划的标准。研究结果表明:首先,对研究文献中泄露的景观色彩评价项目进行重新分类,并通过FGI得到41个评价项目;其次,将41个评价项目分为4类,通过讨论和调查分析,调整为16个评价项目。第三,运用层次分析法进行分析,在主要分类中,重要性依次为和谐(.394)>连续性(.257)>美学(.193)>象征(.156),证实两两比较具有合理的一致性。通过对各评价项目的相对重要性分析,考虑重要权重的优先顺序为:与周边自然环境和谐>与周边建筑和谐>景观要素关系改善>景观和谐连续”。“和谐”所包含的评价项目大多排名较高,“象征”所包含的评价项目普遍排名较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信