The Rise and Professionalization of the American Fundraising Model in Higher Education

N. Skinner
{"title":"The Rise and Professionalization of the American Fundraising Model in Higher Education","authors":"N. Skinner","doi":"10.2979/phileduc.3.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:American higher education has been grounded in entrepreneurialism and focused on private philanthropy from its creation. However, fundraising was not always such a highly professionalized process. Higher education administration engaged in fundraising were cognizant of their efforts as they strove to build a professional field, which sought as its mission the advancement of higher education. Through their associations they developed norms, practices, and defined the standards of their field. Today, institutional advancement in higher education is an established enterprise, often organized under a mission to raise funds for the university from private sources. Through a textual analysis of Council for Advancement and Support of Education's (CASE) monthly periodicals, Currents, the American College Public Relations Association's (ACPRA) monthly periodicals, Pride, and the Greenbrier Report, this paper examines how professional associations actively and intentionally defined the purpose, practices, and standards that created the field of institutional advancement in the United States.","PeriodicalId":343186,"journal":{"name":"Philanthropy & Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philanthropy & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/phileduc.3.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:American higher education has been grounded in entrepreneurialism and focused on private philanthropy from its creation. However, fundraising was not always such a highly professionalized process. Higher education administration engaged in fundraising were cognizant of their efforts as they strove to build a professional field, which sought as its mission the advancement of higher education. Through their associations they developed norms, practices, and defined the standards of their field. Today, institutional advancement in higher education is an established enterprise, often organized under a mission to raise funds for the university from private sources. Through a textual analysis of Council for Advancement and Support of Education's (CASE) monthly periodicals, Currents, the American College Public Relations Association's (ACPRA) monthly periodicals, Pride, and the Greenbrier Report, this paper examines how professional associations actively and intentionally defined the purpose, practices, and standards that created the field of institutional advancement in the United States.
美国高等教育筹资模式的兴起与专业化
摘要:美国高等教育从创立之初就以企业家精神为根基,关注私人慈善事业。然而,筹资并不总是一个高度专业化的过程。从事募款工作的高等教育行政部门意识到他们的努力,因为他们努力建立一个专业领域,以推动高等教育的发展为使命。通过他们的协会,他们制定了规范,实践,并定义了他们领域的标准。今天,高等教育机构的进步是一个既定的事业,通常是在一个从私人来源为大学筹集资金的使命下组织起来的。本文通过对美国教育促进与支持委员会(CASE)的月刊《Currents》、美国大学公共关系协会(ACPRA)的月刊《Pride》和《Greenbrier Report》的文本分析,考察了专业协会是如何积极地、有意地定义了创造美国机构进步领域的目的、实践和标准的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信