MYKHAILO SOROKA IS A MORAL SYMBOL OF FIGHTERS FOR FREEDOM OF UKRAINE 1940–1980S

Y. Zaytsev
{"title":"MYKHAILO SOROKA IS A MORAL SYMBOL OF FIGHTERS FOR FREEDOM OF UKRAINE 1940–1980S","authors":"Y. Zaytsev","doi":"10.33402/nd.2019-7-234-243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study of the history of the Ukrainian national liberation movement of the 20th century involves explaining not only global processes and milestones, but, crucially, the role of specific figures in this movement in the context of real-time political circumstances and social changes. The proposed article is based on a sufficiently wide source base, first of all, on documents of the Soviet special services, mostly unpublished. The author considers his task to show the spiritual and ideological integrity of the character of Mykhailo Soroka, his high intelligence, thorough education, European thinking, his leadership qualities, firmness in defending his views and ignoring the insidious KGB temptations, a talent of the organizer, tolerance in comradely relations, self-initiation to the majestic prospect of creating an independent democratic Ukrainian state.\n\nAn important component of M. Soroka's personal life was his marriage to a well-known member and regional leader of OUN Kateryna Zarytska. A brief account of her unique biography fails to outline the multifaceted nature and tragedy of this person's selfless. However, it clearly illustrates the anti-humanity of the Bilshovyk-communist regime.\n\nM. Soroka's speech at the trial of 1953 in Syktyvkar deserves special attention. It was an indictment of the Soviet regime. He stressed that every nation has the right to a dignified life with \"full freedom of conscience, thought, speech and assembly.\" Moreover, he can get it only in an independent state. Soroka considered the ancestry of disobedience and a sense of justice as an instrument of achieving this aim. He stated that \"if we are not attacked, we certainly do not need to defend ourselves.\"\nKeywords: Soroka, Zarytska, arrest, court, detention, OUN-North, uprising, independent Ukraine, rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":112217,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary era","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33402/nd.2019-7-234-243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study of the history of the Ukrainian national liberation movement of the 20th century involves explaining not only global processes and milestones, but, crucially, the role of specific figures in this movement in the context of real-time political circumstances and social changes. The proposed article is based on a sufficiently wide source base, first of all, on documents of the Soviet special services, mostly unpublished. The author considers his task to show the spiritual and ideological integrity of the character of Mykhailo Soroka, his high intelligence, thorough education, European thinking, his leadership qualities, firmness in defending his views and ignoring the insidious KGB temptations, a talent of the organizer, tolerance in comradely relations, self-initiation to the majestic prospect of creating an independent democratic Ukrainian state. An important component of M. Soroka's personal life was his marriage to a well-known member and regional leader of OUN Kateryna Zarytska. A brief account of her unique biography fails to outline the multifaceted nature and tragedy of this person's selfless. However, it clearly illustrates the anti-humanity of the Bilshovyk-communist regime. M. Soroka's speech at the trial of 1953 in Syktyvkar deserves special attention. It was an indictment of the Soviet regime. He stressed that every nation has the right to a dignified life with "full freedom of conscience, thought, speech and assembly." Moreover, he can get it only in an independent state. Soroka considered the ancestry of disobedience and a sense of justice as an instrument of achieving this aim. He stated that "if we are not attacked, we certainly do not need to defend ourselves." Keywords: Soroka, Zarytska, arrest, court, detention, OUN-North, uprising, independent Ukraine, rehabilitation.
Mykhailo soroka是1940 - 80年代乌克兰自由战士的道德象征
对20世纪乌克兰民族解放运动历史的研究不仅涉及解释全球进程和里程碑,而且至关重要的是,在实时政治环境和社会变化的背景下,这一运动中具体人物的作用。拟议的文章所依据的资料来源足够广泛,首先是苏联特别部门的文件,其中大部分未发表。作者认为他的任务是展示米哈伊洛·索罗卡人物的精神和思想完整性,他的高智商,全面的教育,欧洲思维,他的领导才能,坚定地捍卫自己的观点,无视潜伏的克格勃诱惑,组织者的才能,同志关系中的宽容,对建立一个独立民主的乌克兰国家的宏伟前景的自我启蒙。索罗卡先生个人生活的一个重要组成部分是他与一位著名成员和地区领导人卡特琳娜·扎里茨卡的婚姻。对她独特的传记的简短叙述无法勾勒出这个人无私的多面性和悲剧。然而,它清楚地说明了毕尔绍维克共产主义政权的反人性。索罗卡1953年在锡克特夫卡尔受审时的讲话值得特别注意。这是对苏维埃政权的控诉。他强调,每个国家都有权过上有尊严的生活,享有“良心、思想、言论和集会的充分自由”。此外,他只有在一个独立的国家才能得到它。索罗卡认为不服从的祖先和正义感是实现这一目标的工具。他表示,“如果我们没有受到攻击,我们当然不需要为自己辩护。”关键词:索罗卡,扎里茨卡,逮捕,法院,拘留,联合国北方,起义,独立的乌克兰,复兴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信