HUMANISTIC RISKS OF DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY: ANALYSIS OF WORKS BY FOREIGN AUTHORS

O. Goryacheva, M. Yakovleva
{"title":"HUMANISTIC RISKS OF DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY: ANALYSIS OF WORKS BY FOREIGN AUTHORS","authors":"O. Goryacheva, M. Yakovleva","doi":"10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-2-78-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitalization is one of the most factors in the development of postmodern societies. Building an information society with the introduction of digital technologies in various spheres of life is provided for by national programs of various states, including Russia. Despite advantages of this transformation of the social system, the digital technological vector of the development of societies also contains significant risks. The aim of the work is to identify the humanistic risks of digitalization social system. The methodological basis of the research were the theory of the social system by N. Luhmann, the concept of microphysics of power by M. Foucault, the analysis of the logic Big Data by N. Boltz, research in the field of sociology of things by V. Vakhstein. The authors have identified a principles of functioning social digital environment that contradict the humanistic traditions of democratic societies with their ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens. Among such principles are the principle of totality, the principle of transparency, the principle of objectification and the principle of programming social practices. The results of the research have practical potential in the development of programms for building a digital society.","PeriodicalId":288940,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-2-78-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digitalization is one of the most factors in the development of postmodern societies. Building an information society with the introduction of digital technologies in various spheres of life is provided for by national programs of various states, including Russia. Despite advantages of this transformation of the social system, the digital technological vector of the development of societies also contains significant risks. The aim of the work is to identify the humanistic risks of digitalization social system. The methodological basis of the research were the theory of the social system by N. Luhmann, the concept of microphysics of power by M. Foucault, the analysis of the logic Big Data by N. Boltz, research in the field of sociology of things by V. Vakhstein. The authors have identified a principles of functioning social digital environment that contradict the humanistic traditions of democratic societies with their ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens. Among such principles are the principle of totality, the principle of transparency, the principle of objectification and the principle of programming social practices. The results of the research have practical potential in the development of programms for building a digital society.
社会数字化发展的人文风险:国外作家作品分析
数字化是后现代社会发展的重要因素之一。包括俄罗斯在内的各个国家的国家计划都规定了在生活的各个领域引入数字技术来建设信息社会。尽管社会制度的这种转变具有优势,但社会发展的数字技术载体也包含重大风险。这项工作的目的是识别数字化社会系统的人文风险。研究的方法论基础是N. Luhmann的社会系统理论、M. Foucault的权力微观物理学概念、N. Boltz的逻辑大数据分析、V. Vakhstein在物的社会学领域的研究。作者已经确定了一种有效的社会数字环境原则,这种原则与民主社会的人文传统相矛盾,因为民主社会确保公民的权利和自由。这些原则包括整体性原则、透明性原则、客观化原则和规划社会实践原则。研究结果对数字社会建设方案的制定具有实践潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信