Polsko-mołdawski konflikt handlowy w latach 1780–1785 a polityka wewnętrzna Stanisława Augusta Poniatowskiego

Witold Filipczak
{"title":"Polsko-mołdawski konflikt handlowy w latach 1780–1785 a polityka wewnętrzna Stanisława Augusta Poniatowskiego","authors":"Witold Filipczak","doi":"10.18778/8220-090-4.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conflict over trade between Poland and Moldavia in the 80s of the 18th century has already elicited interest of historians from Poland, Romania and Moldova. The contributions of Jan Reychman, Veniamin Ciobanu and Valentin Arapu are particularly relevant but they do not exhaust the analyzed topic. The time-frame of the article is 1780–1785 although the origin of the conflict dates back to 1778 when Constantin Moruzi forbade the import of Polish vodka to Moldavia. The year 1785 accepted as the final element in the time-frame does to mean that the conflict came to an end then. After Antoni Dzieduszycki had left Istanbul in 1780, the Polish affairs were taken over by Stanisław Pichelstein, whose official role was that of translator (dragoman) and Head of School of Oriental Languages. The article ends with the accession to the throne of Alexandru Mavrocordat II, who succeeded Alexandru Mavrocordat I; the ensuing response of the Polish political elite to this event is also analyzed. The sources that constitute the basis for the analysis come from The Central Archives of Historical Records in Warsaw, and they include the correspondence of Pichelstein with Stanisław August’s cabinet and Department of Foreign Affairs of the Permanent Council. Another important source that has not been used so far is Stanisław August’s domestic correspondence from the Princes Czartoryski Library in Cracow. It shows how the Polish court tried to make use of the contacts established with hospodars by the high-ranking officials from the voivodeships bordering on Moldavia (i.e. the voivodeships of Braclaw and Podolia) who made demands on Jassy. On behalf of the nobility in their voivodeships, the aforementioned officials demanded that restrictions on the vodka trade should be lifted. This was done in strict agreement with the recommendations from Warsaw.","PeriodicalId":375902,"journal":{"name":"Władza i polityka w czasach nowożytnych. Dyplomacja i sprawy wewnętrzne","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Władza i polityka w czasach nowożytnych. Dyplomacja i sprawy wewnętrzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-090-4.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conflict over trade between Poland and Moldavia in the 80s of the 18th century has already elicited interest of historians from Poland, Romania and Moldova. The contributions of Jan Reychman, Veniamin Ciobanu and Valentin Arapu are particularly relevant but they do not exhaust the analyzed topic. The time-frame of the article is 1780–1785 although the origin of the conflict dates back to 1778 when Constantin Moruzi forbade the import of Polish vodka to Moldavia. The year 1785 accepted as the final element in the time-frame does to mean that the conflict came to an end then. After Antoni Dzieduszycki had left Istanbul in 1780, the Polish affairs were taken over by Stanisław Pichelstein, whose official role was that of translator (dragoman) and Head of School of Oriental Languages. The article ends with the accession to the throne of Alexandru Mavrocordat II, who succeeded Alexandru Mavrocordat I; the ensuing response of the Polish political elite to this event is also analyzed. The sources that constitute the basis for the analysis come from The Central Archives of Historical Records in Warsaw, and they include the correspondence of Pichelstein with Stanisław August’s cabinet and Department of Foreign Affairs of the Permanent Council. Another important source that has not been used so far is Stanisław August’s domestic correspondence from the Princes Czartoryski Library in Cracow. It shows how the Polish court tried to make use of the contacts established with hospodars by the high-ranking officials from the voivodeships bordering on Moldavia (i.e. the voivodeships of Braclaw and Podolia) who made demands on Jassy. On behalf of the nobility in their voivodeships, the aforementioned officials demanded that restrictions on the vodka trade should be lifted. This was done in strict agreement with the recommendations from Warsaw.
1780-1785 年波兰与摩尔达维亚的贸易冲突以及斯坦尼斯瓦夫-奥古斯特-波尼亚托夫斯基的国内政策
18世纪80年代,波兰和摩尔多瓦之间的贸易冲突已经引起了波兰、罗马尼亚和摩尔多瓦历史学家的兴趣。Jan Reychman, Veniamin Ciobanu和Valentin Arapu的贡献特别相关,但他们并没有穷尽所分析的主题。这篇文章的时间框架是1780-1785年,尽管冲突的起源可以追溯到1778年,当时康斯坦丁·莫鲁兹禁止向摩尔多瓦进口波兰伏特加。1785年被接受为时间框架的最后一个因素并不意味着冲突在那时结束了。1780年Antoni Dzieduszycki离开伊斯坦布尔后,波兰事务由Stanisław Pichelstein接管,他的官方角色是翻译(dragoman)和东方语言学院院长。文章以继承亚历山德鲁·马夫罗科达一世的亚历山德鲁·马夫罗科达二世即位结束;文章还分析了波兰政治精英对此事件的反应。构成分析基础的资料来源来自华沙的中央历史档案,其中包括皮切尔斯坦与Stanisław奥古斯特内阁和常设理事会外交部的通信。另一个迄今尚未使用的重要资料来源是Stanisław克拉科夫恰尔托里斯基王子图书馆8月份的国内信件。它显示了波兰法院如何试图利用与摩尔达维亚接壤的省(即布拉劳省和波多利亚省)的高级官员与收容所建立的联系,这些官员向雅西提出了要求。上述官员代表各省的贵族要求取消对伏特加贸易的限制。这是严格按照华沙的建议进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信