Evaluation and Selection of Cloud Service: A neutrosophic model

A. Salamai
{"title":"Evaluation and Selection of Cloud Service: A neutrosophic model","authors":"A. Salamai","doi":"10.54216/nif.010202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The variety of cloud-based services that are now accessible is expanding at a fast pace, and as a result, it has become much more difficult for regular customers to choose the appropriate cloud services. When selecting an appropriate service to use in a setting where there is a high degree of unpredictability, it is in the user's best interest to be able to deal with ambiguous information. This is because the Cloud service environment contains a great number of unknowns, which may prevent the user from making wise choices. In this paper, the authors propose a framework that they call the Optimal Service Choice and Priority of Cloud Computing (CC) Service. This methodology gives cloud customers the ability to evaluate the various service options available to them relying on QoS (Quality of Requirements) standards. The model employs a mixed approach to decision making that is based on many factors. The PROMETHEE is used for the purpose of ranking and prioritizing the QoS criteria, and to get the final rank of cloud services. The suggested methodology is a Multi-criteria decision making approach due to this problem contain many conflicting criteria. The PROMETHEE is integrated with neutrosophic environment to overcome uncertainty information. The application of methodology is provided.","PeriodicalId":270575,"journal":{"name":"Neutrosophic and Information Fusion","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neutrosophic and Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54216/nif.010202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The variety of cloud-based services that are now accessible is expanding at a fast pace, and as a result, it has become much more difficult for regular customers to choose the appropriate cloud services. When selecting an appropriate service to use in a setting where there is a high degree of unpredictability, it is in the user's best interest to be able to deal with ambiguous information. This is because the Cloud service environment contains a great number of unknowns, which may prevent the user from making wise choices. In this paper, the authors propose a framework that they call the Optimal Service Choice and Priority of Cloud Computing (CC) Service. This methodology gives cloud customers the ability to evaluate the various service options available to them relying on QoS (Quality of Requirements) standards. The model employs a mixed approach to decision making that is based on many factors. The PROMETHEE is used for the purpose of ranking and prioritizing the QoS criteria, and to get the final rank of cloud services. The suggested methodology is a Multi-criteria decision making approach due to this problem contain many conflicting criteria. The PROMETHEE is integrated with neutrosophic environment to overcome uncertainty information. The application of methodology is provided.
云服务的评价与选择:一个中性模型
现在可访问的各种基于云的服务正在快速扩展,因此,对于常规客户来说,选择合适的云服务变得更加困难。在高度不可预测性的环境中选择适当的服务时,能够处理模棱两可的信息符合用户的最大利益。这是因为云服务环境包含大量未知因素,这可能会妨碍用户做出明智的选择。在本文中,作者提出了一个框架,他们称之为云计算(CC)服务的最优服务选择和优先级。这种方法使云计算客户能够根据QoS(需求质量)标准评估各种可用的服务选项。该模型采用基于多种因素的混合决策方法。PROMETHEE用于对QoS标准进行排序和优先级排序,并获得云服务的最终排名。由于该问题包含许多相互冲突的标准,因此建议的方法是一种多标准决策方法。PROMETHEE与中性环境相结合,克服了不确定性信息。给出了方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信