The Appeal of Independence: Exploring Europe's Way of Political Legitimacy

A. Vauchez
{"title":"The Appeal of Independence: Exploring Europe's Way of Political Legitimacy","authors":"A. Vauchez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2881913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars generally agree that ‘independent institutions’ have become a ubiquitous and pervasive feature of EU polity. The blossoming of regulatory agencies, the critical role of the European Court of Justice, the salient position of the European Central Bank and of the Commission (particularly its powerful and quasi-autonomous DG Comp) have exemplified an overall process of delegation of governmental functions to institutions put at distance from direct diplomatic and electoral ‘pressures’. Yet, most accounts of this ‘rise of the unelected’ have stuck to sector-specific explanations providing idiosyncratic reasons for the ‘functionality’ of statutory independence in the different judicial, monetary, executive branches of EU government. As a result, we still fail to grasp the deep and cross-sectorial entanglement between ‘independence’ and the ‘European project’. This paper brings together recent streams of scholarship in historical sociology, critical legal scholarship and political science and uses them to suggest a renewed narrative of EU polity-formation, whereby ‘independence’ and ‘expertise’ form the very terrain on which Europe’s political capacity and specialised form of authority have been shaped, staged and consolidated.","PeriodicalId":166531,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Interdependence (Topic)","volume":"563 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Interdependence (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2881913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Scholars generally agree that ‘independent institutions’ have become a ubiquitous and pervasive feature of EU polity. The blossoming of regulatory agencies, the critical role of the European Court of Justice, the salient position of the European Central Bank and of the Commission (particularly its powerful and quasi-autonomous DG Comp) have exemplified an overall process of delegation of governmental functions to institutions put at distance from direct diplomatic and electoral ‘pressures’. Yet, most accounts of this ‘rise of the unelected’ have stuck to sector-specific explanations providing idiosyncratic reasons for the ‘functionality’ of statutory independence in the different judicial, monetary, executive branches of EU government. As a result, we still fail to grasp the deep and cross-sectorial entanglement between ‘independence’ and the ‘European project’. This paper brings together recent streams of scholarship in historical sociology, critical legal scholarship and political science and uses them to suggest a renewed narrative of EU polity-formation, whereby ‘independence’ and ‘expertise’ form the very terrain on which Europe’s political capacity and specialised form of authority have been shaped, staged and consolidated.
独立的吸引力:探索欧洲的政治合法性之路
学者们普遍认为,“独立机构”已经成为欧盟政体中无处不在的特征。监管机构的蓬勃发展、欧洲法院的关键作用、欧洲央行和欧盟委员会的突出地位(尤其是其强大的准自治DG Comp)都体现了政府职能下放给机构的整体过程,这些机构与直接的外交和选举“压力”保持距离。然而,大多数关于这种“非民选崛起”的说法都坚持针对特定部门的解释,为欧盟政府不同司法、货币和行政部门的法定独立性的“功能”提供了特殊的理由。因此,我们仍然未能把握“独立”和“欧洲计划”之间深刻的跨部门纠缠。本文汇集了历史社会学、批判性法律学术和政治学方面的最新学术成果,并利用它们提出了一种新的欧盟政治形成叙事,即“独立”和“专业知识”形成了欧洲政治能力和专门权威形式形成、上演和巩固的非常地形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信