{"title":"Dredging, drilling, and mapping television’s swamps: An interview with John Caldwell on the 20th anniversary of Televisuality","authors":"M. Stauff, J. Caldwell","doi":"10.5117/NECSUS2015.2.STAU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1995, John Caldwell’s Televisuality: Style, Crisis and Authority in American Television familiarised media studies with a heterodox methodology, mixing formal analysis and technical insights with work floor knowledge with elaborate theorising. In this interview Caldwell describes how this approach emerged from a conjuncture of practices as different as art school, farm labor, and high theory. Instead of defining the theoretical essence of the medium this combination of approaches allowed for a recursive mapping and drilling of television’s dynamics. Caldwell claims the ‘commercial media industrial systems’ can neither be understood nor effectively criticised with a one-sizefits-all approach; rather, only if we seriously take into account the changing concepts and practices that emerge within these systems. This also requires a pedagogy which does not teach a well-defined model of analysis but rather makes room for collaborative, open-ended research.","PeriodicalId":174743,"journal":{"name":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/NECSUS2015.2.STAU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 1995, John Caldwell’s Televisuality: Style, Crisis and Authority in American Television familiarised media studies with a heterodox methodology, mixing formal analysis and technical insights with work floor knowledge with elaborate theorising. In this interview Caldwell describes how this approach emerged from a conjuncture of practices as different as art school, farm labor, and high theory. Instead of defining the theoretical essence of the medium this combination of approaches allowed for a recursive mapping and drilling of television’s dynamics. Caldwell claims the ‘commercial media industrial systems’ can neither be understood nor effectively criticised with a one-sizefits-all approach; rather, only if we seriously take into account the changing concepts and practices that emerge within these systems. This also requires a pedagogy which does not teach a well-defined model of analysis but rather makes room for collaborative, open-ended research.
1995年,约翰·考德威尔(John Caldwell)的《电视:美国电视的风格、危机和权威》(televisality: Style, Crisis and Authority In American Television)使媒体研究熟悉了一种非正统的方法论,将形式分析和技术见解与工作场所知识与精心设计的理论化相结合。在这次采访中,考德威尔描述了这种方法是如何从艺术学校、农场劳动和高等理论等不同实践的结合中出现的。而不是定义媒体的理论本质,这种方法的组合允许递归映射和钻电视的动态。考德威尔声称,“商业媒体工业系统”既不能理解,也不能用一刀切的方法有效地批评;相反,只有我们认真考虑到这些系统中出现的不断变化的概念和实践。这也需要一种教学法,这种教学法不是教授一个定义明确的分析模型,而是为合作的、开放式的研究留出空间。