Medical and ethical considerations in palliative sedation at the end of life

E. Krakauer
{"title":"Medical and ethical considerations in palliative sedation at the end of life","authors":"E. Krakauer","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among patients with an advanced terminal illness whose primary goal is comfort, severe suffering occurs occasionally that is refractory even to intensive palliative care with standard medicines and techniques. Controlled deep sedation, sometimes to unconsciousness, may be the only effective means of protecting patients from end of life suffering in these unusual situations. Thus, it is ethically imperative that deep palliative sedation be accessible for these rare situations. Ethical provision of deep palliative sedation requires that the main goal of care agreed upon with the patient or the patient’s surrogate be comfort, that there be agreement to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments, that informed consent be obtained from the patient or surrogate, that all staff members actively involved in caring for the patient be informed in advance of the plan, that the clinical intention be demonstrated by using the minimum doses of medicine needed to achieve an adequate degree of comfort, and that dose titration be based on close observation of the patient. Deep palliative sedation may be used to assure comfort during terminal discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Deep palliative sedation is ethically fundamentally different from euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and should not be confused with these practices.","PeriodicalId":369448,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among patients with an advanced terminal illness whose primary goal is comfort, severe suffering occurs occasionally that is refractory even to intensive palliative care with standard medicines and techniques. Controlled deep sedation, sometimes to unconsciousness, may be the only effective means of protecting patients from end of life suffering in these unusual situations. Thus, it is ethically imperative that deep palliative sedation be accessible for these rare situations. Ethical provision of deep palliative sedation requires that the main goal of care agreed upon with the patient or the patient’s surrogate be comfort, that there be agreement to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments, that informed consent be obtained from the patient or surrogate, that all staff members actively involved in caring for the patient be informed in advance of the plan, that the clinical intention be demonstrated by using the minimum doses of medicine needed to achieve an adequate degree of comfort, and that dose titration be based on close observation of the patient. Deep palliative sedation may be used to assure comfort during terminal discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Deep palliative sedation is ethically fundamentally different from euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and should not be confused with these practices.
临终时姑息性镇静的医学和伦理考虑
在以舒适为主要目标的晚期绝症患者中,偶尔会发生严重的痛苦,即使采用标准药物和技术进行强化姑息治疗也难以治愈。在这些不寻常的情况下,有控制的深度镇静(有时会使患者失去意识)可能是保护患者免受临终痛苦的唯一有效手段。因此,在这些罕见的情况下,深度姑息性镇静在伦理上是势在必行的。深度缓和镇静的伦理提供要求与病人或病人的代理人商定的主要护理目标是舒适,同意停止或撤销维持生命的治疗,从病人或代理人那里获得知情同意,所有积极参与照顾病人的工作人员都要提前被告知计划。临床意图应通过使用最低剂量的药物来达到适当的舒适程度,剂量的测定应基于对患者的密切观察。深度姑息性镇静可用于确保机械通气终止期间的舒适。深度姑息性镇静在伦理上与安乐死和医生协助自杀有着根本的不同,不应与这些做法混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信