Electronic health literacy among adults with chronic pain: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey

Hyejin Park, G. Martorella, G. Schluck
{"title":"Electronic health literacy among adults with chronic pain: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey","authors":"Hyejin Park, G. Martorella, G. Schluck","doi":"10.32920/ihtp.v1i3.1469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Approximately 100 million American adults are living with chronic pain, which costs the healthcare system an average of $560–635 billion each year. Levels of health literacy and ehealth literacy are important factors in determining a patient’s capacity to manage pain and the multidimensional impact of pain. To our knowledge, few studies have specifically examined the level of ehealth literacy and its association with health literacy among chronic pain patients. The purpose of this study was to 1) assess the levels of health literacy and ehealth literacy in adults with chronic pain, and 2) examine the relationship between health literacy and ehealth literacy skills among adults diagnosed and living with chronic pain. Methods: A non-experimental, descriptive cross-sectional survey was distributed to adults with chronic pain. A total of 196 participants were asked to complete questionnaires related to demographic characteristics, ehealth literacy (eHEALS), and health literacy (HLQ). Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize data from all the scales used in the study. Results: The average level of ehealth literacy was 32.6 (SD 4.4) out of 40. The level of health literacy was measured by four subscales: having sufficient information to manage my health (mean=2.8; SD=0.55), appraisal of health information (mean=3.27; SD=0.41), ability to find good health information (mean=3.68; SD=0.45), and understanding health information well enough to know what to do (mean=3.66; SD=0.48). Two subscales (i.e., appraisal of health information, ability to find good health information) were significant in predicting ehealth literacy total score. Discussion and Conclusions: Examining ehealth literacy and health literacy can assist in the dissemination of accessible and understandable chronic-pain-related health information for individuals of all health literacy levels. In addition, this will allow the development of interventions for enhancing ehealth literacy skills and/or usability of web-based information for adults with chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":231465,"journal":{"name":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32920/ihtp.v1i3.1469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 100 million American adults are living with chronic pain, which costs the healthcare system an average of $560–635 billion each year. Levels of health literacy and ehealth literacy are important factors in determining a patient’s capacity to manage pain and the multidimensional impact of pain. To our knowledge, few studies have specifically examined the level of ehealth literacy and its association with health literacy among chronic pain patients. The purpose of this study was to 1) assess the levels of health literacy and ehealth literacy in adults with chronic pain, and 2) examine the relationship between health literacy and ehealth literacy skills among adults diagnosed and living with chronic pain. Methods: A non-experimental, descriptive cross-sectional survey was distributed to adults with chronic pain. A total of 196 participants were asked to complete questionnaires related to demographic characteristics, ehealth literacy (eHEALS), and health literacy (HLQ). Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize data from all the scales used in the study. Results: The average level of ehealth literacy was 32.6 (SD 4.4) out of 40. The level of health literacy was measured by four subscales: having sufficient information to manage my health (mean=2.8; SD=0.55), appraisal of health information (mean=3.27; SD=0.41), ability to find good health information (mean=3.68; SD=0.45), and understanding health information well enough to know what to do (mean=3.66; SD=0.48). Two subscales (i.e., appraisal of health information, ability to find good health information) were significant in predicting ehealth literacy total score. Discussion and Conclusions: Examining ehealth literacy and health literacy can assist in the dissemination of accessible and understandable chronic-pain-related health information for individuals of all health literacy levels. In addition, this will allow the development of interventions for enhancing ehealth literacy skills and/or usability of web-based information for adults with chronic pain.
成人慢性疼痛患者的电子健康素养:一项描述性横断面调查
背景:大约有1亿美国成年人患有慢性疼痛,每年平均花费医疗保健系统5600 - 6350亿美元。卫生知识普及水平和电子卫生知识普及水平是决定患者管理疼痛能力和疼痛多方面影响的重要因素。据我们所知,很少有研究专门调查了慢性疼痛患者的电子健康素养水平及其与健康素养的关系。本研究的目的是1)评估慢性疼痛成人的健康素养和电子健康素养水平,以及2)检查诊断和生活在慢性疼痛中的成人的健康素养和电子健康素养技能之间的关系。方法:对患有慢性疼痛的成人进行非实验性、描述性横断面调查。共有196名参与者被要求完成与人口统计学特征、电子健康素养(eHEALS)和健康素养(HLQ)相关的问卷调查。描述性统计计算汇总了研究中使用的所有量表的数据。结果:在40人中,平均健康素养水平为32.6 (SD 4.4)。健康素养水平通过四个子量表来衡量:有足够的信息来管理我的健康(平均=2.8;SD=0.55)、健康信息评价(mean=3.27;SD=0.41)、查找良好健康信息的能力(mean=3.68;SD=0.45),了解健康信息,知道该做什么(均值=3.66;SD = 0.48)。两个子量表(即对健康信息的评价、找到良好健康信息的能力)在预测电子健康素养总分方面具有重要意义。讨论和结论:检查电子健康素养和健康素养有助于向所有健康素养水平的个人传播可获取和可理解的慢性疼痛相关健康信息。此外,这将有助于制定干预措施,提高患有慢性疼痛的成人的电子卫生素养技能和/或网络信息的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信