Ocena skuteczności programu „Rodzina 500+” w zakresie ograniczenia ubóstwa i zwiększenia dzietności w Polsce

Paulina Kucharska
{"title":"Ocena skuteczności programu „Rodzina 500+” w zakresie ograniczenia ubóstwa i zwiększenia dzietności w Polsce","authors":"Paulina Kucharska","doi":"10.15678/znuek.2020.0989.0505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : The article evaluates the effectiveness of Poland’s “Family 500+” programme in reducing poverty and increasing the fertility rate. Research Design & Methods : The research method used is analysis of statistical data and source literature in Polish and English. Findings : The study proves that Poland’s “Family 500+” programme has been partially effective. The additional child allowance has helped reduce poverty, but has not noticeably increased the fertility rate. Implications / Recommendations : A number of pro-natalist barriers coupled with a fertility rate persistently below 2.0 since the early 1990s has meant that financial aid alone cannot sufficiently encourage Poles to start a family. Demographic development stimulation should consist of comprehensive policies, including not only financial transfers but particularly activities mitigating the negative effects of socio-cultural changes. Contribution : The article evaluates the effectiveness of the “Family 500+” programme, and thus the economic validity of introducing the most expensive family policy in the history of the Third Republic of Poland. The paper provides a multidimensional view on the causes of low fertility and the socio-economic consequences of lowering the poverty rate.","PeriodicalId":417291,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15678/znuek.2020.0989.0505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective : The article evaluates the effectiveness of Poland’s “Family 500+” programme in reducing poverty and increasing the fertility rate. Research Design & Methods : The research method used is analysis of statistical data and source literature in Polish and English. Findings : The study proves that Poland’s “Family 500+” programme has been partially effective. The additional child allowance has helped reduce poverty, but has not noticeably increased the fertility rate. Implications / Recommendations : A number of pro-natalist barriers coupled with a fertility rate persistently below 2.0 since the early 1990s has meant that financial aid alone cannot sufficiently encourage Poles to start a family. Demographic development stimulation should consist of comprehensive policies, including not only financial transfers but particularly activities mitigating the negative effects of socio-cultural changes. Contribution : The article evaluates the effectiveness of the “Family 500+” programme, and thus the economic validity of introducing the most expensive family policy in the history of the Third Republic of Poland. The paper provides a multidimensional view on the causes of low fertility and the socio-economic consequences of lowering the poverty rate.
评估波兰 "家庭 500+"计划在减少贫困和提高生育率方面的成效
目的:本文评价波兰“500+家庭”计划在减少贫困和提高生育率方面的效果。研究设计与方法:研究方法采用波兰语和英语的统计数据和原始文献分析。研究结果:该研究证明波兰的“500+家庭”项目部分有效。额外的子女津贴有助于减少贫困,但并没有显著提高生育率。影响/建议:自20世纪90年代初以来,一些支持生育的障碍加上生育率一直低于2.0,这意味着单靠财政援助不足以鼓励波兰人组建家庭。刺激人口发展应包括全面的政策,不仅包括财政转移,而且特别包括减轻社会文化变化的消极影响的活动。贡献:本文评估了“家庭500+”计划的有效性,从而评估了引入波兰第三共和国历史上最昂贵的家庭政策的经济有效性。这篇论文提供了一个多维的视角来看待低生育率的原因和降低贫困率的社会经济后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信