Is Silicon Valley Tech Diversity Possible Now?

Center for Employment Equity UMass-Amherst
{"title":"Is Silicon Valley Tech Diversity Possible Now?","authors":"Center for Employment Equity UMass-Amherst","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3407983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information technology firms have been growing rapidly and are generating high paid jobs, impressive returns on investment, and incredible stock returns. The Silicon Valley region in particular has been singled out as the global hub for innovation and income growth. Simultaneously, Silicon Valley Tech firms have generated sustained criticism for a lack of demographic diversity and repeated accusations of hostile work climates toward women and minority employees. For large Silicon Valley Tech public recognition of continued employment diversity challenges as well as claims of hostile workplaces are widespread. We examine diversity in the Tech industry by calculating executive, managerial and professional employment shares by race and gender for 177 leading Silicon Valley Tech firms, comparing them to 1,277 smaller Tech firms. These shares come from data reported to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2016, which every large workplace is required to submit under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Overall, we document for the first time considerable variability among firms in their employment diversity. Diversity in Tech is clearly possible now and our results suggest that some firms have already figured out how to do it. We also show that it is possible to develop metrics for evaluating firm’s success or failure relative to their peers. Benchmarking firm success or failure at achieving more diverse workforces is a prerequisite for holding both firms and their management teams accountable as well as increasing transparency to both internal and external stakeholders. The causes of Tech’s diversity problems are no doubt complex. This does not mean, however, that the solutions need be. Employment diversity is a mathematical result of who gets hired, promoted and retained. To change diversity these three simple factors need to be measured, monitored and managed. Since the internal climates of firms are central to both recruitment and retention, in the end this is what needs to be managed. These firms already know how to develop innovative products, compete in dynamic global markets, hire in competitive labor markets, and are rapidly transforming our world. It’s difficult to come up with a plausible reason why many cannot manage diversity. In this report we show that some firms are diverse, so then the question becomes why some are not.","PeriodicalId":301526,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3407983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Information technology firms have been growing rapidly and are generating high paid jobs, impressive returns on investment, and incredible stock returns. The Silicon Valley region in particular has been singled out as the global hub for innovation and income growth. Simultaneously, Silicon Valley Tech firms have generated sustained criticism for a lack of demographic diversity and repeated accusations of hostile work climates toward women and minority employees. For large Silicon Valley Tech public recognition of continued employment diversity challenges as well as claims of hostile workplaces are widespread. We examine diversity in the Tech industry by calculating executive, managerial and professional employment shares by race and gender for 177 leading Silicon Valley Tech firms, comparing them to 1,277 smaller Tech firms. These shares come from data reported to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2016, which every large workplace is required to submit under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Overall, we document for the first time considerable variability among firms in their employment diversity. Diversity in Tech is clearly possible now and our results suggest that some firms have already figured out how to do it. We also show that it is possible to develop metrics for evaluating firm’s success or failure relative to their peers. Benchmarking firm success or failure at achieving more diverse workforces is a prerequisite for holding both firms and their management teams accountable as well as increasing transparency to both internal and external stakeholders. The causes of Tech’s diversity problems are no doubt complex. This does not mean, however, that the solutions need be. Employment diversity is a mathematical result of who gets hired, promoted and retained. To change diversity these three simple factors need to be measured, monitored and managed. Since the internal climates of firms are central to both recruitment and retention, in the end this is what needs to be managed. These firms already know how to develop innovative products, compete in dynamic global markets, hire in competitive labor markets, and are rapidly transforming our world. It’s difficult to come up with a plausible reason why many cannot manage diversity. In this report we show that some firms are diverse, so then the question becomes why some are not.
硅谷的科技多样性现在可能实现吗?
信息技术公司发展迅速,创造了高薪工作,令人印象深刻的投资回报,以及令人难以置信的股票回报。硅谷地区尤其被选为全球创新和收入增长的中心。与此同时,硅谷科技公司因缺乏人口多样性和对女性和少数族裔员工充满敌意的工作环境而不断受到批评。对于硅谷的大型科技公司来说,公众普遍认识到就业多样性的持续挑战,以及对工作场所充满敌意的说法。我们通过计算177家领先的硅谷科技公司按种族和性别划分的高管、管理人员和专业人员的就业比例,并将其与1277家规模较小的科技公司进行比较,来检验科技行业的多样性。这些比例来自2016年向美国平等就业机会委员会报告的数据,根据1964年《民权法案》,每个大型工作场所都必须提交这些数据。总体而言,我们首次记录了公司在就业多样性方面的巨大差异。现在,科技行业的多元化显然是可能的,我们的研究结果表明,一些公司已经找到了实现这一目标的方法。我们还表明,有可能制定衡量公司相对于同行的成功或失败的指标。对公司的成功或失败进行基准测试,以实现更多样化的员工队伍,这是让公司及其管理团队负责的先决条件,也是提高对内部和外部利益相关者的透明度的先决条件。科技行业多元化问题的原因无疑是复杂的。然而,这并不意味着解决方案必须如此。就业多样性是谁被雇佣、晋升和留任的数学结果。要改变多样性,就需要衡量、监测和管理这三个简单的因素。由于公司的内部环境对招聘和保留至关重要,最终这就是需要管理的。这些公司已经知道如何开发创新产品,在充满活力的全球市场竞争,在竞争激烈的劳动力市场招聘,并正在迅速改变我们的世界。很难想出一个合理的理由来解释为什么许多公司无法管理多样性。在这份报告中,我们展示了一些公司是多元化的,那么问题就变成了为什么有些公司不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信