Implementing the Precautionary Principle in Urban Pest Management: The Quebec Experience

D. Talbot
{"title":"Implementing the Precautionary Principle in Urban Pest Management: The Quebec Experience","authors":"D. Talbot","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2501383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Canada, the regulation of pesticides is a jurisdiction shared between federal, provincial and municipal governments. In Quebec, the sale of household insecticides increased by almost 600% between 1970 and 1990. The government adopted a code in April 2003 respecting pesticide management in urban environments. This article focuses on the factors that influenced policy-makers when adopting these green regulations. The data were gathered during a four-month observation period at the Quebec Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks. More than 200 documents were analyzed and four key individuals were interviewed. In Quebec, pesticide management in urban settings represents a case in which decision-making was largely based on the precautionary principle. Thus, the potentially harmful effects of pesticides on human health and the environment took precedence over impacts on the economy. A number of pesticide manufacturers recently launched a challenge to these regulations, basing their claims on the free trade rules set out under chapter 11 of NAFTA. Nevertheless, other Canadian provinces have decided to adopt legislation governing the use of pesticides for aesthetic purposes.","PeriodicalId":314145,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2501383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Canada, the regulation of pesticides is a jurisdiction shared between federal, provincial and municipal governments. In Quebec, the sale of household insecticides increased by almost 600% between 1970 and 1990. The government adopted a code in April 2003 respecting pesticide management in urban environments. This article focuses on the factors that influenced policy-makers when adopting these green regulations. The data were gathered during a four-month observation period at the Quebec Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks. More than 200 documents were analyzed and four key individuals were interviewed. In Quebec, pesticide management in urban settings represents a case in which decision-making was largely based on the precautionary principle. Thus, the potentially harmful effects of pesticides on human health and the environment took precedence over impacts on the economy. A number of pesticide manufacturers recently launched a challenge to these regulations, basing their claims on the free trade rules set out under chapter 11 of NAFTA. Nevertheless, other Canadian provinces have decided to adopt legislation governing the use of pesticides for aesthetic purposes.
在城市有害生物管理中实施预防原则:魁北克的经验
在加拿大,农药的监管是由联邦、省和市政府共同管辖的。在魁北克省,家用杀虫剂的销售在1970年至1990年间增长了近600%。政府于2003年4月通过了一项关于城市环境农药管理的法规。本文着重分析了影响政策制定者采纳这些绿色法规的因素。这些数据是在魁北克可持续发展、环境和公园部为期四个月的观察期收集的。研究人员分析了200多份文件,并采访了四位关键人物。在魁北克,城市环境中的农药管理是一个主要根据预防原则作出决策的案例。因此,农药对人类健康和环境的潜在有害影响优先于对经济的影响。一些农药制造商最近对这些法规提出了挑战,他们的主张是基于北美自由贸易协定第11章规定的自由贸易规则。然而,加拿大其他省份已决定通过立法,管理为美观目的而使用杀虫剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信