Curriculum Approach used in Teaching English : A Case Study

Elda Selja Putri, Absharini Kardena
{"title":"Curriculum Approach used in Teaching English : A Case Study","authors":"Elda Selja Putri, Absharini Kardena","doi":"10.32505/jades.v3i2.4642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development and implementation of language teaching programs can be approached in several different ways, each of which has different implications for curriculum design. Indonesian schools have started modernizing their curricula by adopting a backward design that places an emphasis on students' learning outcomes in order to replace the outdated forward paradigm. They must, however, overcome a difficulty in order to achieve a beneficial alignment. This problem spurred a case study examination of the primary curriculum's objectives, syllabus, methodology, and evaluation. The results of the research indicate that the curriculum was created forward, despite claims that it was designed backward, with learning outcomes acting as program goals. In truth, the one that follows it promotes the exchange of knowledge above the development of skills. Since they still relied on information transmission, the program's learning goals were not linked with the three important components of syllabus, methodology, and assessment. The university's innovation of technique including a transfer in emphasis from the lecturer to the students was nonetheless rigidly and mechanically interpreted, and the assessment of student learning was said to be criterion-referenced without more explanation for each syllabus.","PeriodicalId":148903,"journal":{"name":"JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v3i2.4642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development and implementation of language teaching programs can be approached in several different ways, each of which has different implications for curriculum design. Indonesian schools have started modernizing their curricula by adopting a backward design that places an emphasis on students' learning outcomes in order to replace the outdated forward paradigm. They must, however, overcome a difficulty in order to achieve a beneficial alignment. This problem spurred a case study examination of the primary curriculum's objectives, syllabus, methodology, and evaluation. The results of the research indicate that the curriculum was created forward, despite claims that it was designed backward, with learning outcomes acting as program goals. In truth, the one that follows it promotes the exchange of knowledge above the development of skills. Since they still relied on information transmission, the program's learning goals were not linked with the three important components of syllabus, methodology, and assessment. The university's innovation of technique including a transfer in emphasis from the lecturer to the students was nonetheless rigidly and mechanically interpreted, and the assessment of student learning was said to be criterion-referenced without more explanation for each syllabus.
课程教学法在英语教学中的应用:个案研究
语言教学计划的发展和实施可以通过几种不同的方式进行,每种方式对课程设计都有不同的影响。印度尼西亚的学校已经开始现代化他们的课程,采用一种落后的设计,强调学生的学习成果,以取代过时的向前范式。然而,他们必须克服一个困难,以实现有益的结盟。这个问题促使对小学课程的目标、教学大纲、方法和评价进行个案研究。研究结果表明,该课程是向前创建的,尽管有人声称它是向后设计的,以学习成果作为课程目标。事实上,紧随其后的是知识的交流,而不是技能的发展。由于他们仍然依赖于信息传递,项目的学习目标没有与教学大纲、方法和评估这三个重要组成部分联系起来。大学的技术创新,包括将重点从讲师转移到学生身上,被严格而机械地解释,学生学习的评估被认为是标准参考,而没有对每个教学大纲进行更多的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信