Evaluation of Aesthetic Perceptions of Public Buildings’ Façades by Design Professionals

Reuben Peters Omale
{"title":"Evaluation of Aesthetic Perceptions of Public Buildings’ Façades by Design Professionals","authors":"Reuben Peters Omale","doi":"10.2218/ear.2022.7802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual assessments are very relevant in the study of architecture since this is a profession that relies immensely on the visual sense of humans. This study contributes to the understanding of visual perceptions, as well as to the wider field of environment and behaviour studies. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the aesthetic perceptions of public buildings among design professionals with a view towards understanding the mindsets of different design professions towards façade designs. The study considered three types of design professionals: architects, engineers and industrial designers/artists. Two hundred questionnaires were analysed using a mixed methods approach. The variables used in analysing the façades of public buildings were roof design, façade colour, entrance design, fenestration arrangements and innovation in building form. Twelve images of public office buildings in Alagbaka in Akure, Nigeria, were selected for study using random selection and cluster classification methods. A photo-interviewing analysis method was adopted for analysing visual images of the buildings: first-hand visual data were obtained from the study site using digital photographs of each building, and questionnaires were then administered to respondents regarding the images. Data were measured using five-point semantic differential scales, and relevant information obtained through this method was analysed using descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages. Also, inferential statistics using the Kruskal Wallis test was used to determine whether there existed significant differences within the groups of design professionals. Findings from the quantitative analysis showed that there were no significant differences among the groups, although qualitative interview sessions did reveal that while architects and industrial designers/artists exhibit similarities in aesthetic perceptions of public buildings’ façade designs, the perceptions of engineers differ slightly. While these results need to be treated, interpreted and considered with care, design professionals can learn from these subtle differences in the results. The views of each design profession are important during a design process as the final outcome of the design is greatly dependent on the collective contributions of individual professions due to their peculiarity.","PeriodicalId":349624,"journal":{"name":"Edinburgh Architecture Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edinburgh Architecture Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/ear.2022.7802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual assessments are very relevant in the study of architecture since this is a profession that relies immensely on the visual sense of humans. This study contributes to the understanding of visual perceptions, as well as to the wider field of environment and behaviour studies. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the aesthetic perceptions of public buildings among design professionals with a view towards understanding the mindsets of different design professions towards façade designs. The study considered three types of design professionals: architects, engineers and industrial designers/artists. Two hundred questionnaires were analysed using a mixed methods approach. The variables used in analysing the façades of public buildings were roof design, façade colour, entrance design, fenestration arrangements and innovation in building form. Twelve images of public office buildings in Alagbaka in Akure, Nigeria, were selected for study using random selection and cluster classification methods. A photo-interviewing analysis method was adopted for analysing visual images of the buildings: first-hand visual data were obtained from the study site using digital photographs of each building, and questionnaires were then administered to respondents regarding the images. Data were measured using five-point semantic differential scales, and relevant information obtained through this method was analysed using descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages. Also, inferential statistics using the Kruskal Wallis test was used to determine whether there existed significant differences within the groups of design professionals. Findings from the quantitative analysis showed that there were no significant differences among the groups, although qualitative interview sessions did reveal that while architects and industrial designers/artists exhibit similarities in aesthetic perceptions of public buildings’ façade designs, the perceptions of engineers differ slightly. While these results need to be treated, interpreted and considered with care, design professionals can learn from these subtle differences in the results. The views of each design profession are important during a design process as the final outcome of the design is greatly dependent on the collective contributions of individual professions due to their peculiarity.
设计专业人员对公共建筑立面美感的评价
视觉评估在建筑研究中非常重要,因为这是一个非常依赖于人类视觉的职业。这项研究有助于理解视觉感知,以及更广泛的环境和行为研究领域。本研究的主要目的是评估设计专业人士对公共建筑的审美认知,以了解不同设计专业人士对立面设计的看法。该研究考虑了三种类型的设计专业人士:建筑师、工程师和工业设计师/艺术家。使用混合方法分析了200份问卷。用于分析公共建筑立面的变量包括屋顶设计、立面颜色、入口设计、开窗安排和建筑形式的创新。采用随机选择和聚类分类的方法,选取尼日利亚阿库雷市Alagbaka的12幅公共办公楼图像进行研究。对建筑物的视觉图像进行分析时,采用了照片访谈分析方法:利用每座建筑物的数码照片从研究地点获得第一手视觉数据,然后对受访者就图像进行问卷调查。数据采用五分制语义差异量表测量,通过该方法获得的相关信息采用描述性统计分析,如频率和百分比。此外,使用Kruskal Wallis检验的推理统计来确定设计专业人员组内是否存在显着差异。定量分析的结果显示,虽然定性访谈确实揭示了建筑师和工业设计师/艺术家在公共建筑立面设计的审美观念方面表现出相似之处,但工程师的观念略有不同。虽然这些结果需要仔细处理、解释和考虑,但设计专业人员可以从结果中的这些细微差异中学习。在设计过程中,每个设计专业的观点都很重要,因为设计的最终结果很大程度上取决于各个专业由于其特殊性而做出的集体贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信