Preserve it or not: civilizational identity in the context of globalization

M. Zazulina
{"title":"Preserve it or not: civilizational identity in the context of globalization","authors":"M. Zazulina","doi":"10.21684/2587-8484-2021-5-4-8-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article was prepared as a part of the discussion “Russia and Siberia in the Eurasian socio-cultural space” and is devoted to understanding the problems raised in the work of A. V. Ivanov and Yu. V. Popkov “Spiritual and ecological civilizational perspective: the value potential of youth in the Siberian context”, which initiated this discussion. The aim of the article is to study the place of civilizational identity in the general coordinate system formed by multilevel identity, and in which way the value of civilizational identity as an independent sociocultural phenomenon changes under the influence of globalization processes. The novelty of the research is determined by the research attitude towards the comparative analysis of global and civilizational identities in modern conditions. The author’s view of the changes taking place with the idea of civilization under the influence of globalization, the logic of these processes, internal mechanisms and prospects for further development is proposed. It is shown that globalization initially serves as a trigger for the process of transformation of civilizational identity and sociocultural space in general and then continues to retain its influence as its significant factor. The result of cultural globalization is the formation of a global identity. As a result, global and civilizational identities find themselves in a state of competition, since in the modern system of values they represent two “neighboring” highest levels of identity, transnational in nature, and are largely determined by similar factors. The formation process features of civilizational identity in different conditions (Russia and Europe) are outlined. It is concluded that the general trend is its directed and conscious construction, accompanied by the politicization of this phenomenon. Meanwhile, the difference in the strategies for formation of civilizational identity in Russia and Europe is determined by the emerging relations between civilizational identity and the institution of the national state.","PeriodicalId":286622,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Socium","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Socium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21684/2587-8484-2021-5-4-8-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article was prepared as a part of the discussion “Russia and Siberia in the Eurasian socio-cultural space” and is devoted to understanding the problems raised in the work of A. V. Ivanov and Yu. V. Popkov “Spiritual and ecological civilizational perspective: the value potential of youth in the Siberian context”, which initiated this discussion. The aim of the article is to study the place of civilizational identity in the general coordinate system formed by multilevel identity, and in which way the value of civilizational identity as an independent sociocultural phenomenon changes under the influence of globalization processes. The novelty of the research is determined by the research attitude towards the comparative analysis of global and civilizational identities in modern conditions. The author’s view of the changes taking place with the idea of civilization under the influence of globalization, the logic of these processes, internal mechanisms and prospects for further development is proposed. It is shown that globalization initially serves as a trigger for the process of transformation of civilizational identity and sociocultural space in general and then continues to retain its influence as its significant factor. The result of cultural globalization is the formation of a global identity. As a result, global and civilizational identities find themselves in a state of competition, since in the modern system of values they represent two “neighboring” highest levels of identity, transnational in nature, and are largely determined by similar factors. The formation process features of civilizational identity in different conditions (Russia and Europe) are outlined. It is concluded that the general trend is its directed and conscious construction, accompanied by the politicization of this phenomenon. Meanwhile, the difference in the strategies for formation of civilizational identity in Russia and Europe is determined by the emerging relations between civilizational identity and the institution of the national state.
保存与否:全球化背景下的文明认同
这篇文章是作为“欧亚社会文化空间中的俄罗斯和西伯利亚”讨论的一部分而准备的,致力于理解a.v.伊万诺夫和余在工作中提出的问题。V. Popkov的《精神与生态文明视角:西伯利亚语境下青年的价值潜力》,引发了这一讨论。本文旨在研究文明认同在多层次认同所形成的总体坐标系中的位置,以及文明认同作为一种独立的社会文化现象,在全球化进程的影响下,其价值是如何变化的。这一研究的新颖性是由对现代条件下全球认同与文明认同比较分析的研究态度决定的。作者对全球化影响下的文明观念所发生的变化、变化过程的逻辑、内在机制以及进一步发展的前景提出了看法。研究表明,全球化最初是作为文明认同和社会文化空间转变过程的触发因素,然后继续作为其重要因素保持其影响。文化全球化的结果是全球认同的形成。因此,全球认同和文明认同发现自己处于一种竞争状态,因为在现代价值体系中,它们代表两个“相邻的”最高水平的认同,本质上是跨国的,并且在很大程度上是由类似的因素决定的。概述了不同条件下(俄罗斯和欧洲)文明认同的形成过程特征。总的趋势是有针对性的、自觉的建构,同时伴随着这种现象的政治化。同时,俄罗斯与欧洲文明认同形成策略的差异是由文明认同与民族国家制度之间的新兴关系所决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信